Teams

Winner/Midtown/Montgomery

2026 Broward Adult ESL 55 & Over 6.0 · 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-04vs Dillon/ThomasWon 20
W#2 DoublesMaria Diaz / Patricia Williams vs Cynthia Chruszczyk / Marina Briceno6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaritza Craig / Juan Yang vs Isabel Longo / PattiJoy Nagy6-2, 6-0
2025-11-20vs Dillon/ThomasSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJennifer Montgomery / Patricia Williams vs Debra Reed / Deborah Hinson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMariana Goldvarg / Karla Diab-Herrera vs Leah Parodi / Cynthia Chruszczyk1-6, 0-6
2025-11-13vs Dillon/ThomasWon 20
W#2 DoublesMaritza Craig / Juan Yang vs Anne Stuto / Leah Parodi6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKarla Diab-Herrera / Mariana Goldvarg vs Marina Briceno / PattiJoy Nagy6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-11-06vs Dillon/ThomasLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaureen Winick / Patricia Williams vs Wendy Calvet / Jessica Withum3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Marshall / Jennifer Montgomery vs Marina Briceno / Cynthia Chruszczyk2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesVeronica Cornell / Mariana Goldvarg vs Catherine Thomas / Isabel Longo6-4, 6-4
2025-10-30vs Dillon/ThomasLost 02
L#2 DoublesMaureen Winick / Patricia Williams vs Debra Reed / Deborah Hinson6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Montgomery / Maritza Craig vs Wendy Calvet / Jessica Withum4-6, 1-6
2025-10-23vs Dillon/ThomasSplit 11
L#2 DoublesVeronica Cornell / Maureen Winick vs Catherine Thomas / Jessica Withum6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJuan Yang / Maritza Craig vs Cynthia Chruszczyk / Susan Relicke6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Winner/Midtown/Montgomery4211717145

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Juan Yang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Raquel de Jesus
published 3.5
3.01
Shamena Khan
published 3
2.84
Maritza Craig
published 3
2.75
Maria Diaz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Jennifer Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Maureen Winick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Karla Diab-Herrera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Patricia Williams
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.58
Veronica Cornell
published 3
2.48
Mariana Goldvarg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Yang + Maritza Craig8269% games+16.9% vs expected
Maria Diaz + Jennifer Montgomery2343% games−1.5% vs expected
Karla Diab-Herrera + Veronica Cornell2341% games−9.8% vs expected
Shamena Khan + Raquel de Jesus10357% gamesnot enough data
Veronica Cornell + Mariana Goldvarg224 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Williams + Shamena Khan123 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Williams + Maureen Winick033 matchesnot enough data
Karla Diab-Herrera + Mariana Goldvarg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Juan Yang
13W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.15
3.5
Raquel de Jesus
66W–52L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Shamena Khan
133W–140L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Maritza Craig
113W–116L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Maria Diaz
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Jennifer Montgomery
11W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Maureen Winick
5W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.64
Karla Diab-Herrera
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Patricia Williams
11W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%73%<1%
2.59
3
Veronica Cornell
19W–27L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Mariana Goldvarg
3W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.