Teams

Dillon/Thomas

2026 Broward Adult ESL 55 & Over 6.0 · 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-04vs Winner/Midtown/MontgomeryLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebra Reed / Deborah Hinson vs Shamena Khan / Deborah Marshall1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Chruszczyk / Marina Briceno vs Maria Diaz / Patricia Williams4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesIsabel Longo / PattiJoy Nagy vs Maritza Craig / Juan Yang2-6, 0-6
2025-11-20vs Winner/Midtown/MontgomeryLost 01
L#2 DoublesDebra Reed / Deborah Hinson vs Jennifer Montgomery / Patricia Williams4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-13vs Winner/Midtown/MontgomeryLost 12
W#1 DoublesDebra Reed / Deborah Hinson vs Shamena Khan / Deborah Marshall6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnne Stuto / Leah Parodi vs Maritza Craig / Juan Yang0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMarina Briceno / PattiJoy Nagy vs Karla Diab-Herrera / Mariana Goldvarg7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-11-06vs Winner/Midtown/MontgomeryWon 21
W#1 DoublesWendy Calvet / Jessica Withum vs Maureen Winick / Patricia Williams6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarina Briceno / Cynthia Chruszczyk vs Deborah Marshall / Jennifer Montgomery6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCatherine Thomas / Isabel Longo vs Veronica Cornell / Mariana Goldvarg4-6, 4-6
2025-10-30vs Winner/Midtown/MontgomeryWon 20
W#2 DoublesDebra Reed / Deborah Hinson vs Maureen Winick / Patricia Williams7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWendy Calvet / Jessica Withum vs Jennifer Montgomery / Maritza Craig6-4, 6-1
2025-10-23vs Winner/Midtown/MontgomeryLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarina Briceno / Isabel Longo vs Shamena Khan / Deborah Marshall1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCynthia Chruszczyk / Susan Relicke vs Juan Yang / Maritza Craig0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Wendy Calvet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Debra Reed
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Deborah Hinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Marina Briceno
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Leah Parodi
published 3
2.66
2.65
Anne Stuto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Jessica Withum
published
2.35
Isabel Longo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
PattiJoy Nagy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Relicke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Parodi + Marina Briceno9658% games+5.9% vs expected
Debra Reed + Deborah Hinson7654% games+3.9% vs expected
Marina Briceno + Cynthia Chruszczyk4460% games+1.9% vs expected
Leah Parodi + Anne Stuto1535% games−18.3% vs expected
Leah Parodi + Cynthia Chruszczyk5549% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Withum + Wendy Calvet404 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Withum + Cynthia Chruszczyk033 matchesnot enough data
Anne Stuto + Cynthia Chruszczyk033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Calvet
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
3
Debra Reed
25W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Deborah Hinson
17W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
Marina Briceno
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Leah Parodi
76W–126L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Cynthia Chruszczyk
18W–53L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Anne Stuto
8W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
Jessica Withum
41W–69L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Isabel Longo
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.35
PattiJoy Nagy
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Relicke
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.