Teams

LA - Queen Anne 3.5-4.5W Tri

2023 SoCal Tri-Level - LA · LA - Women 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-23vs LA-LLW-Sets On Fire-Debbie HalimLost 01
L#1 DoublesLiz Franco / Gloria Geller vs April Hartstein / Chandler Nguyen3-6, 5-7
2023-09-16vs LA - Kiss My AceLost 01
L#1 DoublesCelia Dominguez / Krystal Langley vs Lisa Richardson / Karen Beard2-6, 4-6
2023-08-26vs LA-LLW-Sets On Fire-Debbie HalimWon 10
W#1 DoublesGloria Geller / Amy Thompson vs Christine Chen / Chandler Nguyen6-2, 7-5
2023-08-20vs LA-LLW-Sets On Fire-Debbie HalimLost 01
L#1 DoublesCelia Dominguez / Amanda Richardson vs April Hartstein / Mandi Collier2-6, 4-6
2023-08-06vs LA - Kiss My AceLost 01
L#1 DoublesGloria Geller / Krystal Langley vs Tiffany Lee / JANE CHUN2-6, 1-6
2023-07-29vs LA - Kiss My AceLost 01
L#1 DoublesCelia Dominguez / Krystal Langley vs Elaine Chan / JANE CHUN2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-07-16vs LA-LLW-Sets On Fire-Debbie HalimLost 01
L#1 DoublesGloria Geller / Amanda Richardson vs Christine Chen / Jennifer Cotone Gossett1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Shanna Reznik
published
4.17
Gloria Geller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Jennie Speciale
published
3.87
Charlotte Gray
published 4
3.85
3.84
Brittany Blackie
published 4
3.82
Allison Meyerson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Celia Dominguez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Lisa Licht
published
3.64
Michelle Brantley
published
3.30
Graciela Gutierrez
published 3.5
3.29
Megan Abrigo
published
3.00
Valveta Jones
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shanna Reznik
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Gloria Geller
139W–102L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
4.17
Jennie Speciale
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Charlotte Gray
12W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Amanda Richardson
30W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Brittany Blackie
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Allison Meyerson
56W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Celia Dominguez
58W–99L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Licht
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
Michelle Brantley
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Graciela Gutierrez
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Megan Abrigo
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3
Cinderella Gatcheco
49W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
Valveta Jones
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.