Teams

MEA GREEN

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO

10 players · average NTRP 3.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-27vs RMTC NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesHilary Wallace / Sara Oclassen vs Pauline Lahey / Catriona Murray6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesFran Katnik vs Alina Nechepurenko4-6, 2-6
2024-04-20vs BRMST REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnde Bernthal / Nikki Boye vs Sue Vanderberg / Courtney Chan2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-19vs NJ REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesNikki Boye / Ande Bernthal vs Caitlin Bock / Stephanie Shawn3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesFran Katnik vs Terming Chew6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathleen Lupo / Patricia Jamison vs Mallory Karr / Julie Lochner4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-13vs BTA-C GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesHilary Wallace / Ande Bernthal vs Laura Nagel / Ruta Cariov3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesFran Katnik vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Lupo / Suzette Stern vs Janphen Jaktupat / Joyce Kelly2-6, 6-7
2024-03-30vs NJ YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHilary Wallace / Ande Bernthal vs Kirstin Kraig / Jessica Mitchell3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSuzette Stern / Kathleen Lupo vs Paige Orgel / Natasha Uecker6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Kathleen Lupo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Fran Katnik
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.74
Curry Rosato
published 4
3.73
Ande Bernthal
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Mary Jensen
published
3.68
Heather Middleton
published
3.60
Nikki Boye
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Suzette Stern
published
3.24
Sara Oclassen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Patricia Jamison
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ande Bernthal + Nikki Boye11949% games+6.5% vs expected
Heather Middleton + Nikki Boye3448% games+1.5% vs expected
Fran Katnik + Kathleen Lupo8255% games−1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kathleen Lupo
53W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Fran Katnik
29W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Curry Rosato
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Ande Bernthal
27W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Mary Jensen
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Heather Middleton
8W–17L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Nikki Boye
18W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.60
Suzette Stern
0W–9L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Sara Oclassen
11W–33L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Patricia Jamison
5W–21L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.