Teams

BRMST RED

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 3.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-27vs LTA-Q REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStacey Mari / Courtney Chan vs Megan Wingfield / Leah Powers3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCheryl Williams / Katherine Lazenby vs Jenna Osborne / Jodie Morgan6-2, 6-1
2024-04-24vs NJ REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatherine Lazenby / Courtney Chan vs Katie Shaw / Stephanie Shawn6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSue Vanderberg / Claudia Booton vs Josiane Broussard / Laura Pivovar1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-04-20vs MEA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Lazenby / Stacey Mari vs Heather Middleton / Patricia Jamison6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesClaudia Booton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSue Vanderberg / Courtney Chan vs Ande Bernthal / Nikki Boye6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-06vs NJ YELLOWWon 20
W#1 SinglesKatherine Lazenby vs Kirstin Kraig6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCheryl Williams / Sue Vanderberg vs Natasha Uecker / Paige Orgel6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Katherine Lazenby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.90
Stacey Mari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Courtney Chan
published 4
3.58
Yayoi Shaw
published
3.49
Sue Vanderberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Claudia Booton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.33
Cheryl Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue Vanderberg + Claudia Booton171849% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Katherine Lazenby
80W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
4.23
4
Stacey Mari
105W–48L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Courtney Chan
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Yayoi Shaw
17W–15L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Sue Vanderberg
57W–90L career · 3 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Claudia Booton
72W–137L career · 2 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Cheryl Williams
145W–113L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.