Teams

Nelson 40s

2026 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 40 & OVER · WOMEN 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.43 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-21vs Medley/GarnerSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDeborah Barefoot / Margaret Massey vs Lindsay Parker / Renata Kuperus0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAdrienne Beatty vs Ursula Ramsey6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Bonfiglio / Kristin Main vs Sonya Young / Wendy Gilbert6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCandy Pegram / Karen McCarty vs Cheryl Canady / Maggie Bennington3-6, 3-6
2026-05-14vs Medley/GarnerWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren McCarty / Candy Pegram vs Carolyn Gustavson / Meredith Cramer6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCoo Hocker / Katrina Knight vs Marija Alford / Jennifer Garner2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Phelps / Anne Egger vs Ursula Ramsey / Cheryl Canady7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-03vs Medley/GarnerWon 20
W#1 DoublesCandy Pegram / Kristin Main vs Meredith Cramer / Ashley Novak6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnne Egger / Karen McCarty vs Sonya Young / Lindsay Parker7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-19vs Medley/GarnerLost 04
L#1 DoublesCandy Pegram / Adrienne Beatty vs Maggie Bennington / Meredith Cramer3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Bonfiglio vs Helen Mathias-Hinson1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKatrina Knight / Coo Hocker vs Carolyn Medley / Wendy Gilbert4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Berg / Margaret Massey vs Marija Alford / Ursula Ramsey2-6, 6-7
2026-04-07vs Medley/GarnerLost 13
L#1 DoublesLisa Phelps / Sarah Nelson vs Jennifer Garner / Marija Alford3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAdrienne Beatty vs Ursula Ramsey3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Swain / Kristin Main vs Cheryl Canady / Veronica Canihan6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDeborah Barefoot / Catherine Morrison vs Carolyn Medley / Ashley Novak4-6, 1-6
2026-03-26vs Medley/GarnerLost 13
W#1 DoublesKatrina Knight / Candy Pegram vs Carolyn Medley / Carolyn Gustavson7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesRachel Bonfiglio vs Helen Mathias-Hinson3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren McCarty / Catherine Morrison vs Maggie Bennington / Meredith Cramer1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Swain / Margaret Massey vs Lindsay Parker / Renata Kuperus3-6, 5-7
2026-03-22vs Medley/GarnerLost 13
W#1 DoublesKaren McCarty / Shannon Berg vs Sonya Young / Wendy Gilbert6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesKristin Main vs Renata Kuperus2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Phelps / Sarah Nelson vs Jennifer Garner / Marija Alford2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Gilbert / Margaret Massey vs Ashley Novak / Ursula Ramsey0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WOMEN 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Medley/Garner61181022203
2Nelson 40s16101840287

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Kristin Main
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.24
Adrienne Beatty
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Coo Hocker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Catherine Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Rachel Bonfiglio
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.10
Katie Swain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.09
Katrina Knight
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.05
Candy Pegram
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.04
Deborah Barefoot
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.01
Karen McCarty
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.88
Lisa Phelps
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Margaret Massey
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.72
Anne Egger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen McCarty + Anne Egger6154% games−3.6% vs expected
Coo Hocker + Katrina Knight4155% gamesnot enough data
Candy Pegram + Kristin Main224 matchesnot enough data
Karen McCarty + Candy Pegram123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kristin Main
123W–55L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Adrienne Beatty
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Coo Hocker
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Catherine Morrison
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
4.14
Rachel Bonfiglio
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.11
Katie Swain
31W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.10
Katrina Knight
8W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
Candy Pegram
6W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Deborah Barefoot
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
4.04
Karen McCarty
21W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
4.01
Lisa Phelps
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.88
Margaret Massey
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.86
4
Anne Egger
17W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.