Teams

NRS/DeGaetano

2026 IRMSL TriLevel 4.5 · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-20vs VCT/DelavautLost 12
W#1 DoublesLuisa Subia / Laura Williams vs Betsy Sturgis / Debbie Bochte6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Gore / Renee' Palmer vs Kate Simpson / Stacy Hockenhull2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristie Mayer / Brooke Brooks vs Cynthia Croom / Nancy Barry7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-30vs VCT/DelavautWon 21
W#1 DoublesLuisa Subia / Laura Williams vs Betsy Sturgis / Christine Alfert6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarei Baratta / Susan Dennett vs Kate Simpson / Debbie Bochte3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesTillie Borchers / Brooke Brooks vs Jessica Vega Coots / Nancy Barry6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-09vs VCT/DelavautLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Williams / Christina Lovera vs Betsy Sturgis / Darcy Freeman5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarei Baratta / Rachel McGoye vs Stacy Hockenhull / Rachael McLaurin3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTillie Borchers / Christie Mayer vs Alana Hockenhull / Lori Averell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Luisa Subia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Christina Lovera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Sharon DeGaetano
published
3.62
Susan Gore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Tillie Borchers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Carei Baratta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Renee' Palmer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Christie Mayer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Brooke Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lisa Wigley
published
Rachel McGoye
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Dennett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christie Mayer + Brooke Brooks1437% games−7.0% vs expected
Susan Gore + Lisa Wigley314 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Brooks + Tillie Borchers213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luisa Subia
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
4.16
4.5
Christina Lovera
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
Sharon DeGaetano
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.99
Susan Gore
58W–62L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Tillie Borchers
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Carei Baratta
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
Renee' Palmer
64W–70L career · 1 line in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.36
3.5
Christie Mayer
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Brooke Brooks
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
Lisa Wigley
39W–32L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachel McGoye
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Susan Dennett
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.