Teams

VCT/Delavaut

2026 IRMSL TriLevel 4.5 · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.93 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-20vs NRS/DeGaetanoWon 21
L#1 DoublesBetsy Sturgis / Debbie Bochte vs Luisa Subia / Laura Williams7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKate Simpson / Stacy Hockenhull vs Susan Gore / Renee' Palmer6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCynthia Croom / Nancy Barry vs Christie Mayer / Brooke Brooks5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-13vs Buttonwood/PalmaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBetsy Sturgis / Rachael McLaurin vs Marguerite Madden / Sharon Runk0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKristin Hazelton / Jessica Vega Coots vs SHERRY SKINNER / Gillian Boice6-1, 6-1
2026-07-30vs NRS/DeGaetanoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBetsy Sturgis / Christine Alfert vs Luisa Subia / Laura Williams3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKate Simpson / Debbie Bochte vs Carei Baratta / Susan Dennett6-3, 7-6
2026-07-23vs Buttonwood/PalmaWon 21
L#1 DoublesDarcy Freeman / Betsy Sturgis vs Marguerite Madden / Laurin Stocker3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesStacy Hockenhull / Kate Simpson vs Pamela Houri / Lori Glaspey3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlana Hockenhull / Jessica Vega Coots vs Pamela Yannotta / Jessica D'Ambrosio6-0, 6-0
2026-07-09vs NRS/DeGaetanoWon 30
W#1 DoublesBetsy Sturgis / Darcy Freeman vs Laura Williams / Christina Lovera7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStacy Hockenhull / Rachael McLaurin vs Carei Baratta / Rachel McGoye6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlana Hockenhull / Lori Averell vs Tillie Borchers / Christie Mayer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Christine Alfert
published 4.5
4.05
Betsy Sturgis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.86
Darcy Freeman
published 4
3.75
Jessica Vega Coots
published 3.5
3.70
Kate Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Rachael McLaurin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Stacy Hockenhull
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Debbie Bochte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.33
Cynthia Croom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Alana Hockenhull
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Nancy Barry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Kristin Hazelton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Lori Averell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Hockenhull + Kate Simpson8162% games+11.2% vs expected
Darcy Freeman + Stacy Hockenhull3545% gamesnot enough data
Darcy Freeman + Kate Simpson314 matchesnot enough data
Darcy Freeman + Betsy Sturgis224 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Barry + Lori Averell134 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Croom + Jessica Vega Coots213 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Hockenhull + Rachael McLaurin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christine Alfert
36W–42L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Betsy Sturgis
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
4.05
4
Darcy Freeman
16W–18L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.86
3.5
Jessica Vega Coots
90W–40L career · no lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.75
Kate Simpson
12W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.70
Rachael McLaurin
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
Stacy Hockenhull
48W–48L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.60
4
Debbie Bochte
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Cynthia Croom
54W–45L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Alana Hockenhull
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Barry
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Kristin Hazelton
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Lori Averell
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.