Teams

Naples Reserve - Huggins

2022 Collier Combo 18 & Over Spring · 7.5 Women - Spring

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-26vs Quail West - C. SeeseWon 10
W#3 DoublesRamsay Erickson / Renee Facciola vs Christine Seese / Freda Levin6-1, 6-1
2022-05-12vs Heritage Bay - BargerLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaria Blakslee / Macey Tyll vs Stephanie Foley / Susan Flagg1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRamsay Erickson / Renee Facciola vs Sunny Barger / Linda Smith2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-05-05vs Marco YMCA - BallWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaria Blakslee / Angela Ribas vs Donna Digeronimo / Bridget Smagala2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-21vs Quail West - C. SeeseWon 10
W#3 DoublesRamsay Erickson / Renee Facciola vs Tricia Blakeslee / Carla Sancin6-1, 7-5
2022-04-07vs Heritage Bay - BargerWon 10
W#3 DoublesRamsay Erickson / Renee Facciola vs Susie Beaudet / Brenda Rhoda6-2, 6-4
2022-03-31vs Marco YMCA - BallLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarianne Khayat / Peggy Keigley vs Ann Heinauer / Linda Keely2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori Irvin Hawes / Julie Carley vs Kelly Heintzelman / Julie Kastholm1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRamsay Erickson / Peggy Keigley vs Carrie Masci / Susan Julich2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women - Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Macey Tyll
published
3.77
Lynne Huggins
published
3.73
Lori Irvin Hawes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Marianne Khayat
published
3.59
Renee Facciola
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Tricia McBride
published
3.32
Ellen Harvey
published 3.5
3.29
Ramsay Erickson
published
Julie Carley
published
Maria Blakslee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Peggy Keigley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia McBride + Lynne Huggins3349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Macey Tyll
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.93
Lynne Huggins
12W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Lori Irvin Hawes
128W–74L career · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Marianne Khayat
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Renee Facciola
164W–112L career · 4 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Tricia McBride
12W–28L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.50
3.5
Ellen Harvey
24W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Ramsay Erickson
16W–25L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Julie Carley
3W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maria Blakslee
45W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peggy Keigley
92W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.