Teams

Marco YMCA - Ball

2022 Collier Combo 18 & Over Spring · 7.5 Women - Spring

16 players · average NTRP 3.79 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesDana Sacks / Mary Mastrogiacomo vs Cheryl Solimine / Terry Dirr1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Riccio / Jeanette Thevening vs Kelly Heintzelman / Julie Kastholm2-6, 1-6
2022-05-12vs Quail West - C. SeeseWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Mastrogiacomo / Dana Sacks vs Ginny Asgeirsson / Renee Biggam6-1, 6-3
2022-05-05vs Naples Reserve - HugginsWon 21
L#1 DoublesDonna Digeronimo / Bridget Smagala vs Maria Blakslee / Angela Ribas6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDana Sacks / Ann Heinauer vs Tricia McBride / Julie Carley6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLisa Campbell / Linda Keely vs Thora Monette / Kathy Shelgren6-4, 6-1
2022-04-28vs Heritage Bay - BargerLost 02
L#1 DoublesDonna Digeronimo / Dana Sacks vs Stephanie Foley / Susan Flagg6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeanette Thevening / Susanna Haedelt vs Susie Beaudet / Brenda Rhoda2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesAnn Heinauer / Dana Sacks vs Bernadette DiPino / Suzanne Messere7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusanna Haedelt / Jeanette Thevening vs Kelly Heintzelman / Julie Kastholm6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBridget Smagala / Donna Digeronimo vs Brita Swanson / Corey Stranger6-1, 7-6
2022-04-07vs Quail West - C. SeeseWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Correa / Karen Crines vs Nyra Rohskopf / Ginny Asgeirsson6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSusanna Haedelt / Ricki Giersch vs Tricia Blakeslee / Carla Sancin6-2, 6-1
2022-03-31vs Naples Reserve - HugginsWon 20
W#2 DoublesKaren Crines / Dana Sacks vs Tricia McBride / Julie Carley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Digeronimo / Lauren Hattenbach vs Gladyvette Benarroch / Kathy Shelgren5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-03-24vs Heritage Bay - BargerLost 02
L#2 DoublesAnn Heinauer / Lisa Campbell vs MacKenzie Rickman / Kristy Hartfield4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Digeronimo / Dana Sacks vs Susie Beaudet / Shelley Boggess2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women - Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Susanna Haedelt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Ann Heinauer
published 4
3.67
Karen Crines
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Donna Digeronimo
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.53
Dana Sacks
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.52
Keely Miller
published
3.45
Lisa Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Bridget Smagala
published 3.5
3.39
Ricki Giersch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Karen Correa
published
3.30
Jeanette Thevening
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Linda Keely
published
Jennifer Ball
published
Luanne Kerins
published
Maria Riccio
published
Mary Mastrogiacomo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Campbell + Dana Sacks14954% games−4.0% vs expected
Ricki Giersch + Dana Sacks451857% games−4.3% vs expected
Donna Digeronimo + Dana Sacks8554% gamesnot enough data
Jeanette Thevening + Susanna Haedelt10364% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Campbell + Ricki Giersch4553% gamesnot enough data
Karen Crines + Lisa Campbell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Susanna Haedelt
180W–81L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
4.04
4
Ann Heinauer
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Karen Crines
97W–64L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.67
4
Donna Digeronimo
107W–91L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Dana Sacks
218W–149L career · 7 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
Keely Miller
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
Lisa Campbell
131W–100L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Bridget Smagala
18W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Ricki Giersch
139W–68L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Karen Correa
15W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Jeanette Thevening
144W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Linda Keely
11W–22L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Jennifer Ball
19W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Luanne Kerins
65W–31L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maria Riccio
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Mastrogiacomo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.