Teams

CCW JONES

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-24Lost 01
L#2 SinglesApril Falk vs Diane Jackson0-6, 3-6
2021-05-17vs FLYHS BARRYWon 10
W#2 DoublesRenee Crisler / Terry Olerich vs Christi Barry / Lori Schmucker6-1, 6-2
2021-05-10vs LTFCS PLUMMERWon 20
W#1 DoublesTerry Olerich / Renee Crisler vs Susan Moore / Caron Dumler6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesApril Falk vs Terri Plummer6-1, 6-1
2021-05-03vs CSRC NIEMANNLost 01
L#1 DoublesWendy Jones / April Falk vs Sara Breese / Trista Niemann4-6, 3-6
2021-04-26vs FLYHS BARRYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesApril Falk / Wendy Jones vs Leslie Jaworowski / Maggie Wilson4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTerry Olerich / Susan Turner vs Catherine Mast / Lori Schmucker7-5, 6-4
2021-04-19vs LTFCS PLUMMERWon 20
W#1 DoublesWendy Jones / April Falk vs Carrie Ingersoll / Sara Michon6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTerry Olerich / Renee Crisler vs Tami Hulsey / Daria Parker6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
April Falk
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.79
Elizabeth Mayo
published 4
3.78
Renee Crisler
published
3.67
Leslie Brewer
published
3.58
Terry Olerich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Katie Borden
published
Sonia Garrison
published
Susan Hippe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Olerich + Renee Crisler3350% gamesnot enough data
April Falk + Renee Crisler314 matchesnot enough data
Terry Olerich + Leslie Brewer134 matchesnot enough data
Terry Olerich + Elizabeth Mayo134 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Brewer + Elizabeth Mayo314 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Brewer + Renee Crisler404 matchesnot enough data
Sonia Garrison + Elizabeth Mayo123 matchesnot enough data
Sonia Garrison + Renee Crisler303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
April Falk
44W–32L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Elizabeth Mayo
55W–44L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.79
Renee Crisler
35W–10L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
Leslie Brewer
24W–25L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Terry Olerich
22W–29L career · 4 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
Katie Borden
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sonia Garrison
4W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Hippe
2W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.