Teams

LTFCS PLUMMER

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-24vs FLYHS BARRYLost 02
L#2 DoublesSusan Moore / Terri Plummer vs Jamie Roach / Kristi Creps6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCaron Dumler / Charlie Bishop vs Lori Schmucker / Elayna Rathmann1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-05-17vs CSRC NIEMANNSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarrie Ingersoll / Sara Michon vs Vikki ONeil / Diana Garcia-Poore1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTerri Plummer / Charlie Bishop vs Kady Hommel / Amy Laird6-3, 6-4
2021-05-10vs CCW JONESLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Moore / Caron Dumler vs Terry Olerich / Renee Crisler2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTerri Plummer vs April Falk1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCarrie Ingersoll / Sara Michon vs Katie Borden / Sonia Garrison3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-03vs FLYHS BARRYLost 02
L#2 DoublesTerri Plummer / Sara Michon vs Jamie Roach / Kristi Creps4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Ryals / Caron Dumler vs Christi Barry / Lori Schmucker2-6, 1-6
2021-04-26vs CSRC NIEMANNLost 02
L#2 DoublesDaria Parker / Terri Plummer vs Sara Breese / Trista Niemann1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCaron Dumler / Valerie Aldanese vs Vikki ONeil / Amy Laird4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-04-19Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCarrie Ingersoll / Sara Michon vs Wendy Jones / April Falk1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCharlie Bishop / Terri Plummer vs Susan Turner / Elizabeth Mayo2-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Jessica Hilton
published
Carrie Ingersoll
published 4
Charlie Bishop
published 4
3.46
Sara Michon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.38
Tatiana Merkoulova
published
3.38
Terri Plummer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Anne Ryals
published 3.5
3.15
Caron Dumler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Daria Parker
published
Tami Hulsey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Plummer + Charlie Bishop101045% games−10.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Hilton
99W–44L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Carrie Ingersoll
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Charlie Bishop
23W–25L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Sara Michon
83W–94L career · 4 lines in 2021
63%37%<1%
3.46
Tatiana Merkoulova
17W–33L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Terri Plummer
57W–80L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Anne Ryals
24W–19L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Caron Dumler
53W–59L career · 4 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.15
Daria Parker
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tami Hulsey
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.