Teams

Kaminski

2026 SC Adult COMBO 18 & Over-AATL · Adult Women 18 & Over Combo 5.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-03vs AATL/WoodsideSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarsha Mikes / Emma Young vs Kristen Burns / Miranda Wood6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNikki Williams / Addy Enlow vs Katie Tate / Felicia Colvin6-1, 6-4
2026-07-30vs Fermata 5.5 Summer 2026Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Myers / Amanda Kaminski vs Lauren Duckworth / Claire Cunningham3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNikki Williams / Addy Enlow vs Donna Kennaday / Sarah Thompson1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Harvey / Pamela Chestnut vs Paige Rabon / Katie Vargas2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-07-23vs AATL/WoodsideWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Myers / Amanda Kaminski vs Caroline Day / Anna Macdonald6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Hall / Mary Guynn vs Kristen Burns / Miranda Wood1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesNikki Williams / Addy Enlow vs Susan Feustel / Felicia Colvin6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Adult Women 18 & Over Combo 5.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fermata 5.5 Summer 20262051442
2Kaminski1124860
3AATL/Woodside0224961

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Marsha Mikes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Laura Hall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Emma Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Pamela Harvey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Chante Argenti
published 2.5
2.16
Nakia Mccallum
published
2.13
Amanda Kaminski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.12
Addy Enlow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.04
Mary Guynn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.87
Pamela Chestnut
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Hall + Marsha Mikes4261% games+6.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marsha Mikes
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%27%
2.92
Laura Hall
34W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Emma Young
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Pamela Harvey
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Chante Argenti
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nakia Mccallum
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Amanda Kaminski
2W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Addy Enlow
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Mary Guynn
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Pamela Chestnut
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.