Teams

Fermata 5.5 Summer 2026

2026 SC Adult COMBO 18 & Over-AATL · Adult Women 18 & Over Combo 5.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-09-10vs AATL/WoodsideWon 21
L#1 DoublesLauren Duckworth / Paige Rabon vs Miranda Wood / Kristen Burns3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJodie Cha / Mary Pettigrew vs Susanne Spitale / Paige Tiffany6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAgatha Sector / Katie Vargas vs Susan Feustel / Felicia Colvin6-2, 6-3
2026-08-20vs AATL/WoodsideWon 20
W#1 DoublesLauren Duckworth / Claire Cunningham vs Miranda Wood / Vickie Brown6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesVickie Shaw / Sarah Thompson vs Caroline Day / Paige Tiffany0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-30vs KaminskiWon 30
W#1 DoublesLauren Duckworth / Claire Cunningham vs Jennifer Myers / Amanda Kaminski6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDonna Kennaday / Sarah Thompson vs Nikki Williams / Addy Enlow6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPaige Rabon / Katie Vargas vs Pamela Harvey / Pamela Chestnut6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2026-07-16vs AATL/WoodsideWon 20
W#1 DoublesClaire Cunningham / Jodie Cha vs Claire Williams / Mercedes Kucyk6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Kennaday / Mary Pettigrew vs Susan Feustel / Anna Macdonald6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Adult Women 18 & Over Combo 5.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fermata 5.5 Summer 20262051442
2Kaminski1124860
3AATL/Woodside0224961

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Lauren Duckworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Donna Kennaday
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Claire Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.52
Jodie Cha
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.43
Katie Vargas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Paige Rabon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.22
Mary Pettigrew
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vickie Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Duckworth
21W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Donna Kennaday
20W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
2.5
Claire Cunningham
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%24%76%
2.59
Jodie Cha
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%42%58%
2.52
Katie Vargas
18W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.43
Paige Rabon
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.39
Mary Pettigrew
5W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Vickie Shaw
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.