Teams

CSU GOLD

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-05vs TAG SILVERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Meister / Scott Schaffer vs Matt Krammer / Seth Krammer6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesScott Bolton vs Matthew Penhale4-6, 0-6
2024-09-05vs FCCC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesJacob Krause / Scott Bolton vs Tom Weller / Ryan Selby6-7, 4-6
2024-09-03vs CSU WHITESplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Boyle / Scott Schaffer vs Zachary Bekkedahl / Reeves Anderson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesScott Bolton vs Colton Dealy7-5, 6-4
2024-08-15vs CSU GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Bolton / Scott Schaffer vs Giovanni Iosue / Dylan Hatanelas3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-08vs LVTA NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Boyle / Scott Schaffer vs Daniel Jackson / Nikolas Bote6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesScott Bolton vs Max Mazan6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2024-08-01vs TAG SILVERLost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Schaffer / Patrick Donnelly vs Seth Krammer / Matt Krammer6-7, 3-6
2024-07-29vs CSU WHITEWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Dirvonas / Scott Bolton vs Gordon Beck / Elliot Graham3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Scott Bolton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.40
Thomas Carson
published
4.38
Andrew Meister
published 4.5
4.31
Jacob Krause
published
4.28
Michael Dirvonas
published
4.26
Scott Schaffer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Michael Boyle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Bolton + Scott Schaffer224 matchesnot enough data
Jacob Krause + Michael Dirvonas303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Scott Bolton
42W–31L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
4.44
Thomas Carson
18W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Andrew Meister
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.38
Jacob Krause
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
4.31
Michael Dirvonas
16W–17L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Scott Schaffer
97W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.26
Michael Boyle
24W–10L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
4.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.