Teams

CSU GREEN

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

5 players · average NTRP 4.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesGiovanni Iosue / Ian Powers vs Daniel Jackson / Craig Smith6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-08-29vs TAG SILVERWon 20
W#1 DoublesAdam Baker / Ian Powers vs Matt Krammer / Seth Krammer6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGiovanni Iosue / Jake Milliken vs Matthew Penhale / Michael Wagner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-22vs CSU WHITEWon 20
W#1 DoublesIan Powers / Dylan Hatanelas vs Colton Dealy / Reeves Anderson7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGiovanni Iosue vs Zac Wyse6-1, 6-2
2024-08-15vs CSU GOLDWon 20
W#1 DoublesGiovanni Iosue / Dylan Hatanelas vs Scott Bolton / Scott Schaffer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIan Powers / Brennan Ulbert vs Michael Dirvonas / Jacob Krause6-3, 7-5
2024-08-08vs FCCC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesDylan Hatanelas / Brennan Ulbert vs Ryan Selby / Leon Patchett0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesGiovanni Iosue vs Mason Bryant6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJake Milliken / Ian Powers vs Bill Bruschke / Tom Weller7-5, 6-2
2024-08-01vs LVTA NAVYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesIan Powers / Dylan Hatanelas vs Colby Mueller / Nikolas Bote6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGiovanni Iosue / Jake Milliken vs Daniel Jackson / Taylor Nguyen6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-25vs TAG SILVERWon 10
W#1 DoublesGiovanni Iosue / Ian Powers vs Ryan Pace / Matthew Penhale6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.32 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Dylan Hatanelas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.43
Ian Powers
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.29
Jake Milliken
published 4.5
4.12
Giovanni Iosue
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
Brennan Ulbert
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dylan Hatanelas + Ian Powers11261% games+5.4% vs expected
Ian Powers + Giovanni Iosue7061% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dylan Hatanelas
24W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
4.46
4.5
Ian Powers
59W–31L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Jake Milliken
56W–54L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Giovanni Iosue
43W–17L career · 7 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.12
4
Brennan Ulbert
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.