Teams

Simpson/McNabb/Nashville

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women - FRI AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-28vs Childs/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Dorr / Jenny West D'Alba vs Maria Schoonover / Christy Briggs4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Meeks / Jennifer Brown vs Dawn Bowen / Debora Edkin3-6, 5-7
W#4 DoublesCaroline Bryan / Elinor Adams vs Cristin Roark / Kelly Cole6-4, 7-5
2025-03-21vs Hambidge/NashvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesSuzy Simpson / Shari Glickman vs Melinda Senna / Rachel Oliver5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Dearman / Mary Freeman vs Lissa Jarnigan / Elizabeth Centers6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer McNabb / Ashley Stringfellow vs Jaclyn Carney / Kate Tharp6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#4 DoublesStephanie Webb / Lisa Hamlin vs Cristin Hambidge / Nicole Babu3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Ashley Stringfellow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Jennifer Meeks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Shari Glickman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Jenny West D'Alba
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Suzy Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Jennifer McNabb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Sandra Rudd
published
3.27
Julie Dearman
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.26
Elinor Adams
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Lisa Hamlin
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Caroline Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Angela Tarrance
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzy Simpson + Jennifer Meeks404 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Bryan + Julie Dearman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ashley Stringfellow
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.48
Jennifer Meeks
16W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Shari Glickman
42W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Jenny West D'Alba
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Suzy Simpson
29W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Jennifer McNabb
19W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Sandra Rudd
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Julie Dearman
23W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
Elinor Adams
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Lisa Hamlin
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Caroline Bryan
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Angela Tarrance
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.