Teams

Bringard/Broadbent

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 40 & OVER · Women 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-25vs Wilson 40+ 7.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Gonzalez / Lissi Rabon vs Linda Wilson / Katie Swain7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Rackley / Stacy Clemson vs Michelle Leonard / Evelyn Foster1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMartha Broadbent / Jamie Lanzi vs Mary Beth Moore / Julie Cooke5-7, 5-7
2026-08-20vs Janik 40 + 7.5 ComboLost 12
L#1 DoublesMartha Broadbent / Stacy Clemson vs Anne Broderick / Cara Foucht4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Gonzalez / Lissi Rabon vs Kristine Janik / Kelly Capobianco6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBeverly Memory / Amy Morton vs Jennifer Parrotte / Christian Miller0-6, 2-6
2026-08-13vs Williams 7.5 40+Won 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Gonzalez / Lissi Rabon vs Elizabeth Claus / Diana Moore6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJean Robbins / Jamie Lanzi vs Vickie Kosh / Stephanie Farrell1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRenee Saffo / Martha Broadbent vs Heather Weddle / Deb Nelson6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Lissi Rabon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Patricia Thomson
published
3.39
Amy Morton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.29
Jamie Lanzi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Stacy Clemson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Christine Tatum
published 3.5
3.11
Renee Saffo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Kristina Durham
published
2.98
Beverly Memory
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Mary Salisbury
published
2.96
Laura Rackley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Sally Bringard
published
Jean Robbins
published
Martha Broadbent
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lissi Rabon
10W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Patricia Thomson
12W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
4
Amy Morton
1W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
78%22%<1%
3.39
Jamie Lanzi
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Stacy Clemson
50W–87L career · 2 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.25
3.5
Christine Tatum
4W–11L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Renee Saffo
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Kristina Durham
9W–9L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Beverly Memory
8W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
Mary Salisbury
3W–9L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Laura Rackley
10W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.96
Sally Bringard
3W–13L career · no lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94
Jean Robbins
72W–57L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Martha Broadbent
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.