Teams

Janik 40 + 7.5 Combo

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 40 & OVER · Women 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-25vs Glancy 7.5 Combo 26Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Kullberg / Cara Foucht vs Patty Barker / Susan Morgante6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDesiree Morgan / Caroline Blanton vs Nicole Slocumb / Genevieve Hansler4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKristine Janik / Denise Lopatka vs Ali Cause / Leslie Barker6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-20vs Bringard/BroadbentWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Broderick / Cara Foucht vs Martha Broadbent / Stacy Clemson6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKristine Janik / Kelly Capobianco vs Elizabeth Gonzalez / Lissi Rabon3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJennifer Parrotte / Christian Miller vs Beverly Memory / Amy Morton6-0, 6-2
2026-08-13vs Wilson 40+ 7.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Batten / Cara Foucht vs Melissa Straub / Sue Fuller6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJill Scerri / Caroline Blanton vs Katie Swain / Diane Gentry1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLogan Sullivan / Denise Lopatka vs Natasha Hilburn / Kris Summers6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Kimberly Batten
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Anne Broderick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Logan Sullivan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Desiree Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Amy Kullberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Jill Scerri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Cara Foucht
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Christian Miller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Kristine Janik
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Denise Lopatka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Kelly Capobianco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Lyndsey Stainback
published
3.25
Caroline Blanton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Katie Dattilo
published
3.13
Jennifer Parrotte
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cara Foucht + Lyndsey Stainback3259% games+6.1% vs expected
Anne Broderick + Desiree Morgan0547% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Batten + Jennifer Parrotte224 matchesnot enough data
Jill Scerri + Caroline Blanton224 matchesnot enough data
Anne Broderick + Kristine Janik213 matchesnot enough data
Logan Sullivan + Desiree Morgan033 matchesnot enough data
Jill Scerri + Amy Kullberg033 matchesnot enough data
Kristine Janik + Kelly Capobianco123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Batten
20W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Anne Broderick
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Logan Sullivan
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Desiree Morgan
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Amy Kullberg
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
Jill Scerri
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Cara Foucht
17W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.48
3.5
Christian Miller
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
Kristine Janik
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Denise Lopatka
26W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Kelly Capobianco
24W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Lyndsey Stainback
12W–6L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Caroline Blanton
23W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Katie Dattilo
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Jennifer Parrotte
17W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.