Teams

WP NAVY

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-25vs GTC REDWon 41
W#1 DoublesKim Chen / Amy Meadows vs Meg Staebell / Brianna Laffey6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRachael Costain vs Samantha Hanfelder6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusie Morgan / Belinda Nelson vs Sarah Grimmer / Kristin Barry7-5, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKristin Loudis vs Elena Kennedy3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSissel Eckenhausen / Dananne Solomon vs Janessa Jacobsen / Carlie Jacobsen6-2, 6-2
2021-05-20vs CACM PINKWon 31
W#1 DoublesHilary Marano / Rachael Costain vs Wendy Daniel / Diana Rael7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSissel Eckenhausen / Anna Jones vs Carolyn Petersen / Barbara Chin6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKim Chen vs Jaylyn Bunning3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Calle / Dananne Solomon vs Erin Addesso / Helene Grall-Johnson6-2, 6-3
2021-05-18vs CACM TEALLost 05
L#1 DoublesAmy Meadows / Hilary Marano vs Stephanie Carreira / Colleen Becker3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRachael Costain vs Michelle Degitis4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusie Morgan / Karen Calle vs Laura Montoya / Angie Shappell1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKim Chen vs Cristina Denezza4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Froehlich-Olmsted / Kristin Loudis vs Megan Ryall / Alison Finley5-7, 5-7
2021-05-12vs CM REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesSusie Morgan / Hilary Marano vs Shannon Burke / Kass Schwappach6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKim Chen / Kristin Loudis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesRachael Costain vs Mindy Franks6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHeather Froehlich-Olmsted / Karen Calle vs Kristen Daley / Kathy O Shaughnessy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-07vs GTC MAROONWon 32
W#1 DoublesAmy Meadows / Hilary Marano vs Valerie Imperial / Hanh Phi6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKim Chen vs Ali Elkins3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesHeather Froehlich-Olmsted / Belinda Nelson vs Alexandra Pash / Casey Rhine6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKristin Loudis vs Julie McPherson6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKaren Calle / Anna Jones vs Dana Liley / Jametta White6-2, 6-3
2021-05-04vs APR GREENLost 14
L#1 DoublesRachael Costain / Belinda Nelson vs Kathy Cozyn / Angela Hedgepeth4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Meadows vs Kelsey Berlin4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKim Chen / Dananne Solomon vs Jessica Diamond / Nichole Milton6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKristin Loudis vs Nicolette Kolpakov6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSissel Eckenhausen / Anna Jones vs Amanda Hurst / Jody Weisman1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Hilary Marano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Rachael Costain
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4.5
3.69
Kim Chen
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.68
Karen Calle
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Amy Meadows
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.50
Belinda Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Kristin Loudis
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.38
Dananne Solomon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Heather Froehlich-Olmsted
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.00
Sissel Eckenhausen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Susie Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Froehlich-Olmsted + Hilary Marano3357% games+7.2% vs expected
Amy Meadows + Kim Chen6357% games+5.8% vs expected
Kim Chen + Kristin Loudis2646% games−3.6% vs expected
Sissel Eckenhausen + Kristin Loudis2643% games−4.0% vs expected
Belinda Nelson + Kim Chen123 matchesnot enough data
Belinda Nelson + Kristin Loudis033 matchesnot enough data
Belinda Nelson + Susie Morgan213 matchesnot enough data
Heather Froehlich-Olmsted + Karen Calle123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hilary Marano
44W–17L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Rachael Costain
27W–35L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kim Chen
57W–57L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Karen Calle
41W–31L career · 4 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Amy Meadows
44W–39L career · 4 lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Belinda Nelson
24W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
3.50
4
Kristin Loudis
60W–84L career · 5 lines in 2021
78%22%<1%
3.40
3.5
Dananne Solomon
68W–51L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%81%18%
3.38
4
Heather Froehlich-Olmsted
50W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
3.36
3.5
Sissel Eckenhausen
51W–86L career · 3 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.00
Susie Morgan
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.