Teams

GTC RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-05vs GTC MAROONWon 31
W#1 DoublesElena Kennedy / Meg Staebell vs Sarajane Goodfellow / Hanh Phi6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSamantha Hanfelder vs Laurie Hohberger6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJanessa Jacobsen / Brianna Laffey vs Julia K Hall / Jametta White2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKristin Barry / Sarah Grimmer vs Valerie Imperial / Katy Donnelly6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-05-27vs CACM TEALLost 14
L#1 DoublesJill Kroeker / Meg Staebell vs Laura Montoya / Cristina Denezza3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSamantha Hanfelder vs Caroline Carolan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Grimmer / Brianna Laffey vs Colleen Becker / Stephanie Carreira2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesLindsey Reiss vs Megan Ryall2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJanessa Jacobsen / Carlie Jacobsen vs Angie Shappell / Lisa Schwebach6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2021-05-25vs WP NAVYLost 14
L#1 DoublesMeg Staebell / Brianna Laffey vs Kim Chen / Amy Meadows3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSamantha Hanfelder vs Rachael Costain2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Grimmer / Kristin Barry vs Susie Morgan / Belinda Nelson5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesElena Kennedy vs Kristin Loudis6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJanessa Jacobsen / Carlie Jacobsen vs Sissel Eckenhausen / Dananne Solomon2-6, 2-6
2021-05-13vs APR GREENLost 23
L#1 DoublesSarah Grimmer / Kristin Barry vs Kathy Cozyn / Lani Reichardt1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSamantha Hanfelder vs Elizabeth Moser6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCarlie Jacobsen / Holly Luebker vs Arlene Maiava / Nicolette Kolpakov2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJill Kroeker vs Kelsey Berlin1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJanessa Jacobsen / Brianna Laffey vs Jessica Diamond / Nichole Milton6-4, 6-3
2021-05-06vs CACM PINKWon 32
L#1 DoublesJill Kroeker / Jamie Siebrase vs Amy Springer / Sam Springer1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSamantha Hanfelder vs Jaylyn Bunning6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElena Kennedy / Brianna Laffey vs Diana Rael / Wendy Daniel6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesLindsey Reiss vs Mary Therese Eisner6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJanessa Jacobsen / Holly Luebker vs Barbara Chin / Helene Grall-Johnson6-1, 7-6
2021-05-04vs CM REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesJamie Siebrase / Jill Kroeker vs Alison Zuckert / Mindy Franks7-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesLindsey Reiss vs Kristen Daley6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHolly Luebker / Elena Kennedy vs Terri Cohen / Lesley Brophy5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Grimmer / Kristin Barry vs Shannon Burke / Kathy O Shaughnessy5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Meg Staebell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Elena Kennedy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
Jamie Siebrase
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Sarah Grimmer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.71
Janessa Jacobsen
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.70
Holly Luebker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Carlie Jacobsen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Brianna Laffey
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.49
Kristin Barry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Jill Kroeker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Lindsey Reiss
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Samantha Hanfelder
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Barry + Jill Kroeker7754% games+7.5% vs expected
Carlie Jacobsen + Brianna Laffey3353% games+6.3% vs expected
Sarah Grimmer + Kristin Barry3445% games+2.5% vs expected
Brianna Laffey + Holly Luebker7853% games+0.5% vs expected
Janessa Jacobsen + Carlie Jacobsen202448% games−2.5% vs expected
Janessa Jacobsen + Holly Luebker191153% games−4.4% vs expected
Janessa Jacobsen + Brianna Laffey10852% games−4.7% vs expected
Sarah Grimmer + Brianna Laffey2550% games−4.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Meg Staebell
73W–54L career · 3 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
4.19
4
Elena Kennedy
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Jamie Siebrase
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Grimmer
23W–38L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Janessa Jacobsen
52W–58L career · 5 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Holly Luebker
59W–44L career · 3 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Carlie Jacobsen
34W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Brianna Laffey
49W–45L career · 5 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
Kristin Barry
16W–22L career · 4 lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Jill Kroeker
27W–49L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
Lindsey Reiss
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Samantha Hanfelder
24W–27L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.