Teams

CDTA W 55&OW7.0 7.Schaumburg Lauterbach Sun 1 $21

CDTA Winter 55 & over W · E

20 players · average NTRP 3.42 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesSandra Villa / April Berkowski vs Michelle Jurcenko / Janine Stalcup3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSally Ann Martin / Ryoko Howell vs Tomoko Hayashida / Cynthia McCarthy7-5, 3-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAudene Gordon / April Berkowski vs Paula Grabow Duignan / Lucie Kreidler1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesMargo Carvell / Sally Ann Martin vs Kathryn Cattafesta / Suzanne Losasso0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Grabow Sat 2 $226116513135
2CDTA W 55&OW7.0 3.Lake Bluff Zusman Sun 4 $206116513147
3CDTA W 55&OW7.0 8.Naperville Bianchi Fri 7:30 $245213817138
4CDTA W 55&OW7.0 4.Glenbrook Edidin Sat 5 $253491225182
5CDTA W 55&OW7.0 9.Centennial Okada Sat 5 $203481327203
6CDTA W 55&OW7.0 7.Schaumburg Lauterbach Sun 1 $212591225195
7CDTA W 55&OW7.0 2.Heritage Hanrahan Sat 2 $242551634229
8CDTA W 55&OW7.0 1.MT Chi Brown Fri 7 $31.51681328207
9zDROPPED-CDTA W 55&OW7.0 6.Heritage Wozniewski Sat 2 $24000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Lara Phillips
published 4
3.63
Margo Carvell
published 3.5
3.58
Mya Murata
published 4
3.46
Mitzi Kastner
published 3.5
3.35
Debra Scheck
published 3.5
3.28
Deborah Sonoda
published 3.5
April Berkowski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Julie Pawula
published 3.5
3.15
Mika Nomura
published 3.5
3.13
Sandra Villa
published 3.5
3.10
Diana Morgan
published 3.5
3.10
Mishez Avari
published 3.5
3.04
3.01
Ryoko Howell
published 3.5
2.92
Leanne Whitlock
published 3
2.92
Audene Gordon
published 3
2.77
Peggy Schwerman
published 3
2.59
Lynn Callahan
published 3
Rita Williams
published
Sally Ann Martin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leanne Whitlock + Margo Carvell25458% games+10.0% vs expected
Lynn Callahan + Ryoko Howell5648% games+1.7% vs expected
Margo Carvell + Sandra Villa6750% games−1.9% vs expected
Lynn Callahan + Mya Murata6648% games−3.4% vs expected
Ryoko Howell + Cecilia Lauterbach12758% games−3.6% vs expected
Leanne Whitlock + Mya Murata10361% games−5.1% vs expected
Leanne Whitlock + Cecilia Lauterbach2740% games−6.7% vs expected
Lynn Callahan + Lara Phillips4452% games−6.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lara Phillips
98W–91L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
3.5
Margo Carvell
138W–93L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
4
Mya Murata
95W–100L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Mitzi Kastner
57W–47L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Debra Scheck
11W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Deborah Sonoda
22W–30L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
April Berkowski
12W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Julie Pawula
73W–120L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Mika Nomura
66W–47L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Sandra Villa
84W–79L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Diana Morgan
97W–43L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Mishez Avari
53W–87L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Cecilia Lauterbach
83W–87L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
3.5
Ryoko Howell
82W–76L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Leanne Whitlock
83W–88L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Audene Gordon
69W–72L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
2.92
3
Peggy Schwerman
123W–136L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Lynn Callahan
34W–108L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
Rita Williams
27W–28L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally Ann Martin
28W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.