Teams

CDTA W 55&OW7.0 8.Naperville Bianchi Fri 7:30 $24

CDTA Winter 55 & over W · E

14 players · average NTRP 3.59 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#2 DoublesMichelle Jurcenko / Janine Stalcup vs Apple Naughton / Diane Egan6-4, 5-6
W#1 DoublesMichelle Jurcenko / Janine Stalcup vs Sandra Villa / April Berkowski6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Jurcenko / Janine Stalcup vs Carol Paddock / Deborah Holt6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesKristie Traverso / Michelle Jurcenko vs Marie Dillon / Paula Grabow Duignan4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 55&OW7.0 5.Tam Grabow Sat 2 $226116513135
2CDTA W 55&OW7.0 3.Lake Bluff Zusman Sun 4 $206116513147
3CDTA W 55&OW7.0 8.Naperville Bianchi Fri 7:30 $245213817138
4CDTA W 55&OW7.0 4.Glenbrook Edidin Sat 5 $253491225182
5CDTA W 55&OW7.0 9.Centennial Okada Sat 5 $203481327203
6CDTA W 55&OW7.0 7.Schaumburg Lauterbach Sun 1 $212591225195
7CDTA W 55&OW7.0 2.Heritage Hanrahan Sat 2 $242551634229
8CDTA W 55&OW7.0 1.MT Chi Brown Fri 7 $31.51681328207
9zDROPPED-CDTA W 55&OW7.0 6.Heritage Wozniewski Sat 2 $24000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Stephanie Batka
published 4
3.62
Kristie Traverso
published 4
3.44
Michelle Jurcenko
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Janine Stalcup
published 3.5
3.29
Lesa Moskowitz
published 3.5
3.27
Marie Hajduk
published 3.5
3.26
Cynthia McCarthy
published 3.5
3.23
Michelle Yacullo
published 3.5
3.20
Maureen Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Zaneta Gintautas
published 3.5
3.12
Lori Vardas
published 3.5
3.02
Tomoko Hayashida
published 3.5
3.02
Larisa Adamian
published 3.5
2.98
Katherine Bianchi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristie Traverso + Cynthia McCarthy8262% games+13.3% vs expected
Michelle Jurcenko + Marie Hajduk5066% games+12.1% vs expected
Stephanie Batka + Zaneta Gintautas7659% games+5.0% vs expected
Michelle Yacullo + Maureen Henderson5750% games+4.4% vs expected
Janine Stalcup + Michelle Jurcenko18959% games+3.8% vs expected
Stephanie Batka + Lori Vardas26660% games+0.2% vs expected
Katherine Bianchi + Cynthia McCarthy5348% games−0.6% vs expected
Maureen Henderson + Marie Hajduk151056% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephanie Batka
329W–235L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Kristie Traverso
46W–38L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
Michelle Jurcenko
81W–69L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Janine Stalcup
86W–59L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Lesa Moskowitz
134W–118L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Marie Hajduk
130W–86L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Cynthia McCarthy
76W–75L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Michelle Yacullo
166W–110L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Maureen Henderson
101W–68L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Zaneta Gintautas
141W–122L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Lori Vardas
164W–120L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Tomoko Hayashida
116W–176L career · no lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Larisa Adamian
146W–108L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.02
Katherine Bianchi
66W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.