Teams

Mas Serve Aces (MSA)

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - BOISE · TV

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-01vs Old FoonsLost 02
L#2 DoublesBen Shalz / Russell Sauer vs Dave Keim / Mark Seyfried3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlan Day / James Wear vs John Layer / Tom von Alten3-6, 2-6
2021-06-24vs Carl's BoysLost 01
L#3 DoublesGreg Patton / Alan Day vs Timothy Rosandick / Gino Favillo1-6, 5-7
2021-06-22Split 11
W#1 DoublesRon Kristensen / Ben Shalz vs Dit Dudley / Craig Mello6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlan Day / James Wear vs Jim Brigham / Darin Frost0-6, 3-6
2021-06-15vs BangersLost 02
L#1 DoublesRon Kristensen / Ben Shalz vs Kelly Coles / Jeff Morrell5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMike Cooley / Greg Patton vs Jay Larsen / Roger Quarles2-6, 5-7
2021-06-10vs Old FoonsLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlan Day / James Wear vs John Layer / Harry Westover5-7, 2-6
2021-06-05vs Carl's BoysLost 01
L#2 DoublesJames Wear / Alan Day vs Joel Free / Jim Sanchez0-6, 1-6
2021-06-01vs Full Metal RacquetsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRon Kristensen / Ben Shalz vs Steven Buchanan / Jonathan Bloomer6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJan Schiedel / Greg Patton vs David Umberger / Fritz Durham7-6, 6-1
2021-05-25vs BangersLost 02
L#2 DoublesRobert Charles Ewing / Greg Patton vs Ken Coffey / Mark Jacobsen1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Wear / Alan Day vs Jeff Malmstrom / Norm Waite1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Maybe this year?8223718225
2Bangers73201021221
3Old Foons46121839288
4Carl's Boys46121840282
5Mas Serve Aces (MSA)1942652332

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Ron Kristensen
published 4
3.57
Bryan Dingel
published 4
3.35
Michael Hermes
published 3.5
3.32
Charles Novak
published 3.5
3.29
Mike Cooley
published 3.5
3.17
Alan Day
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Jan Schiedel
published
Greg Patton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
James Wear
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3
Ben Shalz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Russell Sauer
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryan Dingel + Ron Kristensen8066% games+12.1% vs expected
Michael Hermes + Mike Cooley91549% games−2.3% vs expected
Ben Shalz + Jan Schiedel10451% gamesnot enough data
Mike Cooley + Russell Sauer0839% gamesnot enough data
Charles Novak + Russell Sauer0628% gamesnot enough data
Charles Novak + Alan Day2448% gamesnot enough data
Mike Cooley + Alan Day0620% gamesnot enough data
Ben Shalz + Ron Kristensen2450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ron Kristensen
65W–62L career · no lines in 2021
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Bryan Dingel
105W–134L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Michael Hermes
57W–107L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Charles Novak
26W–53L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Mike Cooley
62W–121L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Alan Day
29W–97L career · 6 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
Jan Schiedel
65W–59L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Greg Patton
3W–15L career · type M · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
James Wear
4W–43L career · 11 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ben Shalz
16W–32L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Russell Sauer
54W–99L career · 11 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.