Teams

CCOC HUNT

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-04vs CSRC PHILLIPSLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelsey Hunt / Barbara Jean Knorr vs Amy Phillips / Coretta Russell3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-08-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Jamison / Kit McFarland vs Linda Olson / Deena Hiltbrand6-1, 6-2
2023-08-14vs MEMPK SCOTTLost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbara Jean Knorr / Nina Ballenger vs Susan Shaink / Miyo Park2-6, 6-7
2023-07-31vs CSRC PHILLIPSLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoy Farmer / Barbara Jean Knorr vs Allison Guinn / MARY SCOTT6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Jamison / Kit McFarland vs Karen Ohl / Jennifer Peck2-6, 3-6
2023-07-24vs CCW HILLWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Jean Knorr / Melissa Jamison vs Mary Tostanoski / Margaret Hill6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Carol Joslin
published 3.5
3.39
Shannon Leifer
published
3.35
Kit McFarland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Barbara Jean Knorr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Blair Carter
published 3.5
3.22
Kelsey Hunt
published
3.13
Joy Farmer
published
2.66
Pamella Dickey
published
Nina Ballenger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Jean Knorr + Kit McFarland4165% gamesnot enough data
Nina Ballenger + Barbara Jean Knorr404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Joslin
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
Shannon Leifer
13W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Kit McFarland
53W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Barbara Jean Knorr
67W–20L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Blair Carter
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Kelsey Hunt
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Joy Farmer
14W–22L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Pamella Dickey
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
Nina Ballenger
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.