Teams

MEMPK SCOTT

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-09-04vs LTFCS HAMMERWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Shaink / Stacey Self vs Jane Glimco / Katherine Hammer7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2023-08-28vs FLYHS BARTHELMESWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Shaink / Stacey Self vs Joy Barthelmes / Tisha Hickerson6-1, 7-5
2023-08-21vs CCW HILLWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Shaink / Stacey Self vs Mary Tostanoski / Irene Mo7-5, 6-1
2023-08-14vs CCOC HUNTWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Shaink / Miyo Park vs Barbara Jean Knorr / Nina Ballenger6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Diane Scott
published 3.5
3.21
Miyo Park
published
2.96
Susan Shaink
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Stacey Self
published
2.79
Mary Evilsizer
published
Anne Sims
published 3
Amanda Tiffany
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Scott
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Miyo Park
30W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
3
Susan Shaink
114W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
Stacey Self
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
Mary Evilsizer
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Anne Sims
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Amanda Tiffany
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.