Teams

VCC TEAL

2026 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-13vs SS-G ORANGEWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesKayla Kelly / Sarah Esther vs Kees Henderson / Kaitlin Bernhoerster1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-06vs CHCC YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesSarah Esther / Taylor Thornburgh vs Meredith Richardson / Jordan Mahoney6-1, 6-3
L#2 Female SinglesShelbee Riehl vs Caroline Holliday3-6, 3-6
2026-06-29vs KC-CC TEALWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesSarah Esther / Taylor Thornburgh vs Mallory Clark / Anna Masiello6-3, 6-4
W#2 Female SinglesShelbee Riehl vs Kelly Molnar6-1, 6-1
2026-06-15vs HV YELLOWLost 02
L#1 Female SinglesSarah Esther vs Amy Beth Schulz5-7, 1-6
L#2 Female SinglesShelbee Riehl vs Elizabeth Bonder4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-06-08vs GR REDWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesAmy Bergan / Shelbee Riehl vs Taylor Bolazina / Lauren Tinker6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-01vs WC TEALWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesSarah Esther vs Catie O'Dwyer6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DTC GREEN6114718172
2WP-C TEAL5212922178
3GR RED4210816140
4HV YELLOW4211718154
5WC TEAL429918135
6KC-CC TEAL3311717144
7VCC TEAL3381022160
8GPTC GREEN3412920174
9GTC TEAL3491227197
10CHCC YELLOW2481021156
11WP-C PINK2571430209
12NJ NAVY2571431220
13SS-G ORANGE1561226179
14LTC-M RED0751634214

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Sarah Esther
usually #1 Female Doubles 60%, also #1 Female Singles 40% · published 3
2.87
Taylor Thornburgh
published
2.83
Amy Bergan
published 3
2.82
Kayla Kelly
published
2.81
Shelbee Riehl
usually #2 Female Singles 75%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 3
2.25
Meg Glenn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Bergan + Shelbee Riehl2349% games+2.7% vs expected
Kayla Kelly + Taylor Thornburgh404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sarah Esther
21W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Taylor Thornburgh
21W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Amy Bergan
15W–16L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Kayla Kelly
12W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Shelbee Riehl
44W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Meg Glenn
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.