Teams

HV YELLOW

2026 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-13vs WC TEALWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesAmy Beth Schulz vs Kasey Bowden4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-07-06vs SS-G ORANGELost 01
L#1 Female DoublesAmy Beth Schulz / Alexandra Beltz vs Jena Greer / Adria Reed7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-29vs CHCC YELLOWWon 10
W#2 Female SinglesAmy Beth Schulz vs Jordan Mahoney6-3, 6-3
2026-06-22vs KC-CC TEALWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesAlexandra Beltz / Amy Beth Schulz vs Marissa Hagmeyer / Kelly Molnar6-1, 6-3
2026-06-15vs VCC TEALWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesAmy Beth Schulz vs Sarah Esther7-5, 6-1
2026-06-01vs GR REDLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesAmy Beth Schulz / Elizabeth Bonder vs Lauren Tinker / Lindsay Pratt3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DTC GREEN6114718172
2WP-C TEAL5212922178
3GR RED4210816140
4HV YELLOW4211718154
5WC TEAL429918135
6KC-CC TEAL3311717144
7VCC TEAL3381022160
8GPTC GREEN3412920174
9GTC TEAL3491227197
10CHCC YELLOW2481021156
11WP-C PINK2571430209
12NJ NAVY2571431220
13SS-G ORANGE1561226179
14LTC-M RED0751634214

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Rachel Gallen
published
2.74
Amy Beth Schulz
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 3
2.70
Emily Smoot
published
2.69
Alexandra Beltz
published 3
2.55
Hannah Quintana
published
Elizabeth Bonder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexandra Beltz + Hannah Quintana213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Gallen
25W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
3
Amy Beth Schulz
41W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Emily Smoot
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Alexandra Beltz
4W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Hannah Quintana
6W–8L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Elizabeth Bonder
0W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.