Teams

Callaway HCC 3.5

2026 Mixed 18&Over-PB · 3.5 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-19vs Meridian CTALost 02
L#1 DoublesRegan Rhian Parker / William Morris vs D'Quante Evans / Andrea Skelton4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTina Boykin / Jason Boykin vs Katherine Swafford / Turner Hughes6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-19vs Meridian CTALost 12
L#1 DoublesKatherine Callaway / Ben Norval vs Katherine Swafford / D'Quante Evans6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRegan Rhian Parker / Allen Boleware vs Andrea Skelton / Julious Heidelberg0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTina Boykin / Jason Boykin vs Semmes Ford / Turner Hughes6-2, 6-1
2026-05-31vs Meridian CTAWon 21
L#1 DoublesTina Boykin / Jason Boykin vs Julious Heidelberg / Andrea Skelton3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMachelle Weeks / Jamie Massengale vs Turner Hughes / Katherine Swafford4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAllen Boleware / Katherine Callaway vs Chance Davidson / Semmes Ford4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Tina Boykin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ben Norval
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dab McMurray
published 3.5
3.15
Machelle Weeks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Regan Rhian Parker
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Katherine Callaway
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Allen Boleware
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.86
Jamie Massengale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Jason Boykin
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.76
Lauren Gonzales
published
2.68
Kylee Flores
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Machelle Weeks + Jason Boykin3259% gamesnot enough data
Tina Boykin + Jason Boykin2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tina Boykin
65W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Ben Norval
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Dab McMurray
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Machelle Weeks
63W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.15
Regan Rhian Parker
35W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.07
Katherine Callaway
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Allen Boleware
62W–29L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Jamie Massengale
20W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%1%99%
2.86
Jason Boykin
47W–39L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Lauren Gonzales
17W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.76
Kylee Flores
20W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%10%90%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.