Teams

Zhao

2024 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Vanessa Weber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
Teresa Zhao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Brittany Benson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2024-08-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTeresa Zhao / Vanessa Weber vs Stephnie Bonn / Deanna McKay1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Pickens / Vanessa Weber vs Heidi Funke / Lisa Johnston-Smith6-0, 6-2
2024-07-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Pickens / Vanessa Weber vs Kate Quisling / Deborah Cohen6-0, 7-5
2024-07-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTeresa Zhao / Amelia Ryan vs Brooke Kuerbis / Julia Plowman6-4, 6-3
2024-07-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTeresa Zhao / Brittany Benson vs Samantha Damiano / Emily Shue7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesVanessa Weber / Amelia Ryan vs Christy Locke / Marcella Barta6-3, 6-0
2024-06-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesVanessa Weber / Teresa Zhao vs Deb Landau / Anna Tsoi6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Vanessa Weber
56W–35L career
0%47%53%
3.12
3.5
Teresa Zhao
46W–34L career
24%76%0%
3.03
3.5
Brittany Benson
21W–6L career
34%66%0%
3.02

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.