Teams

Soper Team

2024 One Doubles · 4.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-11vs NWW-CalpagiuLost 01
L#1 DoublesConnor Cole / Carlos Cardenas vs Shalin Gehlot / Alex Namba6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2024-08-05vs Backstreet MenWon 10
W#1 DoublesConnor Cole / Carlos Cardenas vs Bryant Pham / Christian Kevin Galang6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-25vs Hans' Revenue StreamsWon 10
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Bethards / Robert Pendley vs Quentin Cheung / ADITYA MIDDHA6-2, 6-2
2024-07-11vs The Tied BreakersWon 10
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Bethards / Carlos Cardenas vs Brandon Ferguson / Dustin Hedger7-6, 7-5
2024-07-09vs MacQuarrieWon 10
W#1 DoublesConnor Cole / Robert Pendley vs Irvin MacQuarrie / Darren Hogben6-0, 6-1
2024-07-03vs Evolution of SchlapWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarlos Cardenas / Benjamin Bethards vs Hiromichi Yamamoto / Nate Estes7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings19 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sop is Him6060022
2NWW-Liu5151241
3NWW-Berisha5151249
4Soper Team5151341
5NWW-Calpagiu5151438
6Tell him he's dreamin4242444
7The Tied Breakers4242449
8Lobbing Lickitungs ™4242540
9Mann On The Hunt3333647
10Nish3333649
11The Ball Slappers2424854
12Moms Spaghetti2424859
13Love at First Serve2424968
14Evolution of Schlap2424951
15Backstreet Men2424967
16Suarez15151060
17Mann 215151062
18Hans' Revenue Streams15151068
19Varon06061274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.56
Benjamin Bethards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.43
Alexander Calpagiu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.36
Robert Pendley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Carlos Cardenas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Connor Cole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connor Cole + Carlos Cardenas3258% games+3.6% vs expected
Carlos Cardenas + Benjamin Bethards4163% gamesnot enough data
Connor Cole + Benjamin Bethards404 matchesnot enough data
Benjamin Bethards + Alexander Calpagiu213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Benjamin Bethards
78W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
4.56
4.5
Alexander Calpagiu
141W–100L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Robert Pendley
53W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
4.36
4.5
Carlos Cardenas
23W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Connor Cole
22W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.