Teams

SDNC 4.5 LSF/ Boone

2024 SoCal Fall Doubles SDNC WE · SDNC Men 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.43 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-10vs SDNC 4.5 SDTC/ MartinezLost 01
L#2 DoublesThomas Savides / Matthew Comyns vs Jordan Einbinder / Erick Russell Elchico2-6, 1-6
2024-11-03vs SDNC LLW 4.5 KCP/ BuggsLost 01
L#3 DoublesThomas Savides / Rick Jensen vs Chad Basinger / Jeffrey Ford3-6, 3-6
2024-10-20Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMatthew Comyns / Rick Jensen vs Xuan Ho / Tony Tran7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJacob Boone / Matthew Comyns vs Russell Silberstein / Myles Vencill6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesThomas Savides / Alex Barnett vs Sirius Yoo / Joshua Gaylis7-5, 7-6
2024-10-06vs SDNC 4.5 SDTC/ MartinezWon 10
W#3 DoublesRick Jensen / Matthew Comyns vs Marty Martinez / Kraig Winters6-2, 6-2
2024-09-29vs SDNC LLW 4.5 KCP/ BuggsLost 01
L#3 DoublesThomas Savides / Alex Barnett vs ALEXANDRE COLAS / Chad Basinger6-7, 4-6
2024-09-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesMatthew Comyns / Mark Volkmann vs Tony Tran / Xuan Ho4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Abe Roder
published 4.5
4.30
Jacob Boone
published 4.5
4.22
James Koontz
published 4.5
4.22
Alex Barnett
published 4.5
4.13
Grant Watkins
published 4.5
4.09
Matthew Comyns
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.63
Keith Greener
published
3.58
Thomas Savides
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Kie Wilcox
published
Kirk Spahn
published
Mark Volkmann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Comyns + Thomas Savides01131% gamesnot enough data
Jacob Boone + Grant Watkins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Abe Roder
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Jacob Boone
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
James Koontz
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Alex Barnett
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Grant Watkins
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
4.13
4.5
Matthew Comyns
35W–60L career · 5 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.09
Keith Greener
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Thomas Savides
23W–70L career · 4 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
Kie Wilcox
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kirk Spahn
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Volkmann
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.