Teams

SDNC LLW 4.5 KCP/ Buggs

2024 SoCal Fall Doubles SDNC WE · SDNC Men 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.65 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-17vs SDNC 4.5 SDTC/ MartinezWon 10
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Nik Speshilov vs Aran Wong / Kraig Winters6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Nik Speshilov vs Tam Doan / Andrew Nguyen6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChad Basinger / Will Garber vs Michael Bui / Nathan Nguyen6-2, 6-4
2024-11-03vs SDNC 4.5 LSF/ BooneLost 01
L#2 DoublesBernie Buggs / Bradin Simms vs Alex Barnett / James Koontz3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-20vs SDNC 4.5 RPTC/ IshiharaWon 10
W#2 DoublesBernie Buggs / Alex Nemerov vs Nicholas Nguyen / Mark Ishihara7-5, 6-1
2024-10-13vs SDNC 4.5 SDTC/ MartinezWon 10
W#3 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeff Ray vs Jose Ruelas / Erick Russell Elchico6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeff Ray vs The-Anh Do / Tam Doan7-6, 6-3
2024-09-29vs SDNC 4.5 LSF/ BooneWon 10
W#2 DoublesNik Speshilov / Bernie Buggs vs Grant Watkins / Kirk Spahn6-1, 6-4
2024-09-15vs SDNC 4.5 RPTC/ IshiharaWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Ford / Will Garber vs Mark Ishihara / Jason Char6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.37 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alex Nemerov
published 5
4.72
Daniel Goldin
published 5
4.45
Jack Zander
published 5
4.42
ALEXANDRE COLAS
published 4.5
4.40
Bernie Buggs
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.31
James MacDonald
published 4.5
4.27
Will Garber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Craig Bramlett
published 4.5
4.21
Bradin Simms
published 4.5
4.19
Chad Basinger
published 4.5
Jeff Ray
published
Jeffrey Ford
published
Nik Speshilov
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Ray + Jeffrey Ford314 matchesnot enough data
Will Garber + Bernie Buggs123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alex Nemerov
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Daniel Goldin
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.72
5
Jack Zander
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
4.45
4.5
ALEXANDRE COLAS
15W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
4.42
4.5
Bernie Buggs
155W–51L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
James MacDonald
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Will Garber
93W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Craig Bramlett
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Bradin Simms
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Chad Basinger
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
4.19
Jeff Ray
20W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeffrey Ford
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nik Speshilov
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.