Teams

Ma.Steinhardt40S

2025 Capital Fall Singles 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-11-07vs He.McCann40SLost 02
L#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Alise Fredrickson1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMaureen Doherty vs Amy Cuni4-6, 1-6
2025-10-20vs El.Nixon40SLost 02
L#2 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Michele Lagerstedt5-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesThassia Roschel vs Jessica Williams4-6, 4-6
2025-10-13vs Sa.Fitzpatrick40SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Shauna Alexander6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Sara Fitzpatrick7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-12vs La.McRee40SLost 12
L#1 SinglesThassia Roschel vs Maryanna Johnson2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Erica Surgent6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Lanier McRee4-6, 5-7
2025-10-06vs An.Garey40SWon 10
W#2 SinglesMaureen Doherty vs Jerri Lemanski6-3, 6-4
2025-09-22vs He.McCann40SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesThassia Roschel vs Courtney Phillips6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Jeannette Walker1-6, 4-6
2025-09-15vs El.Nixon40SLost 02
L#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Casey Novak7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMaureen Doherty vs Michelle Gessner1-6, 2-6
2025-09-08vs Sa.Fitzpatrick40SWon 20
W#2 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Natalie Brincefield6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Amanda Meyer6-1, 6-0
2025-08-25vs An.Garey40SLost 02
L#1 SinglesThassia Roschel vs Jerri Lemanski4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJessica Tyndall vs Allison Bubar2-6, 4-6
2025-08-18vs La.McRee40SLost 01
L#3 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Lanier McRee3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Thassia Roschel
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.61
Maureen Doherty
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.60
Jessica Tyndall
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.59
Mandy Steinhardt
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3
2.32
Nicole Nemmers
published
Tammy Lowry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mandy Steinhardt + Thassia Roschel033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Thassia Roschel
45W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Maureen Doherty
29W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.61
2.5
Jessica Tyndall
49W–70L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%22%78%
2.60
3
Mandy Steinhardt
53W–90L career · 7 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
Nicole Nemmers
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.32
Tammy Lowry
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.