Teams

El.Nixon40S

2025 Capital Fall Singles 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-11-05vs La.McRee40SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMelissa Rini vs Maryanna Johnson1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesBrianna Shait vs Miriam Waters6-0, 6-2
2025-10-20vs Ma.Steinhardt40SWon 10
W#2 SinglesMichele Lagerstedt vs Mandy Steinhardt7-5, 6-3
2025-10-17vs He.McCann40SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCasey Novak vs Amy Cuni6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBrianna Shait vs Jill Wolborsky6-1, 6-1
2025-10-15vs Sa.Fitzpatrick40SLost 01
L#1 SinglesCasey Novak vs Sara Fitzpatrick6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2025-09-29vs An.Garey40SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBrianna Shait vs Meghan Richardson3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMelissa Rini vs Julie Bullock7-6, 6-3
2025-09-22vs La.McRee40SWon 10
W#3 SinglesMelissa Rini vs Rachel Hardin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-15vs Ma.Steinhardt40SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCasey Novak vs Mandy Steinhardt5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMichele Lagerstedt vs Lauren Gray2-6, 0-6
2025-09-08vs He.McCann40SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBrianna Shait vs Jeannette Walker2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesMelissa Rini vs Kay Bonavita6-3, 6-2
2025-09-02vs Sa.Fitzpatrick40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesCasey Novak vs Shannon Vinson6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMelissa Rini vs Laurie Yopp6-3, 6-2
2025-08-23vs An.Garey40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesCasey Novak vs Kathryn Shields7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMelissa Rini vs Allison Bubar6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Melissa Rini
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.92
Michelle Gessner
published
2.85
Brianna Shait
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.82
Michele Lagerstedt
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.77
Casey Novak
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.75
Amanda Shelton
published 3
2.43
Elisabeth Nixon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casey Novak + Melissa Rini5160% games+7.0% vs expected
Brianna Shait + Melissa Rini5061% gamesnot enough data
Michele Lagerstedt + Brianna Shait033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Melissa Rini
65W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Michelle Gessner
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Brianna Shait
86W–65L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Michele Lagerstedt
58W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82
3
Casey Novak
114W–82L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Amanda Shelton
9W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Elisabeth Nixon
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.