Teams

SSLT GREEN

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.21 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-19vs HW GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesBrett Shrewsbury / Simon Payne vs Stephen Bell / Jason Ogden7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesScott Sagel vs Mark Dwyer7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBlair MacNeill / Bryan Ford vs Brent Lenderman / Andy Silverman6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBoyce Markham / Jeffrey Hirschfeld vs Richard Miranda / Michael Gleason6-4, 7-6
2021-07-12vs HFII REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesTim Root / Greg Brooks vs Ryan Nance / Eric Lownsberry3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesBlair MacNeill vs Scott Chaplick6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSimon Payne / Brett Shrewsbury vs Tim Lennek / Zack Peecher6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesScott Sagel / Bryan Ford vs Mark Bird / Lennart Moche6-2, 6-2
2021-07-05vs SSH REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesBarry Doyle / Blair MacNeill vs Philip Bryant / Kenneth Theobald6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesScott Sagel vs William Patterson7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGreg Brooks / Simon Payne vs William Johns / Jon Johnson7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNathan Couch / Bryan Ford vs Monte Sutton / Frank Johns4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-06-28vs KC NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesBarry Doyle / Simon Payne vs Benjamin Gonzales / Mitchell Harper7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBlair MacNeill vs Daniel Read6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesScott Sagel / Nathan Couch vs Roland Denegri / Robert Lobascio2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBryan Ford / Jeffrey Hirschfeld vs Mark Bogart / Mark Hejtmanek6-3, 6-4
2021-06-21vs KC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesTim Root / Greg Brooks vs Sadler Merrill / Brian Zibell3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesScott Sagel vs Reuben Ybarra6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBarry Doyle / Brett Shrewsbury vs Miles Flesche / Charles Flesche6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBryan Ford / Jeffrey Hirschfeld vs Gary Hosler / Keith Pollack6-3, 6-2
2021-06-14vs SSLT REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesScott Sagel / Simon Payne vs Todd Chancey / Lance Newcomb6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTim Root / Greg Brooks vs Jack Hwang / Steve Wolf5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarry Doyle / Boyce Markham vs Stephan Termaat / Keith Robertson6-0, 6-0
2021-06-07vs SH REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesNathan Couch / Barry Doyle vs Michael Wright / Jim Vernon6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBlair MacNeill / Scott Sagel vs Nick Hinton / Justin Kindy6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBryan Ford / Jeffrey Hirschfeld vs Jeff Hamilton / Tim Carnegie3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Barry Doyle
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.10
Scott Sagel
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
4.08
Blair MacNeill
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.90
Brett Shrewsbury
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.76
Greg Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Simon Payne
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.56
Bryan Ford
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.47
Jeffrey Hirschfeld
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Boyce Markham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Nathan Couch
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tim Root
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Root + Greg Brooks11261% games+0.2% vs expected
Simon Payne + Nathan Couch6150% games−1.3% vs expected
Scott Sagel + Brett Shrewsbury4347% gamesnot enough data
Nathan Couch + Barry Doyle5062% gamesnot enough data
Simon Payne + Brett Shrewsbury213 matchesnot enough data
Simon Payne + Greg Brooks213 matchesnot enough data
Scott Sagel + Nathan Couch123 matchesnot enough data
Blair MacNeill + Brett Shrewsbury213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Barry Doyle
39W–2L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
4.36
Scott Sagel
26W–30L career · 7 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Blair MacNeill
38W–14L career · 5 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Brett Shrewsbury
18W–20L career · 3 lines in 2021
78%22%<1%
3.90
4
Greg Brooks
50W–35L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Simon Payne
61W–43L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Bryan Ford
21W–14L career · 6 lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.56
Jeffrey Hirschfeld
14W–16L career · 4 lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
3.47
4
Boyce Markham
26W–56L career · 2 lines in 2021
83%17%<1%
3.38
Nathan Couch
26W–13L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tim Root
16W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.