Teams

RED ROCK CC

2021 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 18 & OVER · 4.5 WOMEN- 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-05-22vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GVWon 21
W#1 DoublesTracy Hall / Pamela Loyd vs Kimberly Taeubel / Irena Feofanova2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmily Adams vs Alice Han-Carlsson5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesColundra Owens / Maria Cortes vs Leslie Gallant / Belinda Smith6-1, 6-2
2021-05-15vs SUMMERLIN ARBORSSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTracy Hall / Pamela Loyd vs Kim Haines / Mary Lynn Weber6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesColundra Owens vs Aubrey Adams4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Janssen / Robin Stenger vs Elisabeth Golden / Virginia Kirkendall6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesEmily Adams vs Claire Fust6-2, 6-2
2021-05-08vs TPCWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacey Carney / Colundra Owens vs Sara Altfas / Madison Sherwood4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStacey Heroy / Terri Weisbord vs Ashton Aguilar / Bonnie Taney4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPamela Loyd / Caroline Hsu vs Marisela Cruz / Chrys Smiley6-2, 6-1
2021-05-01vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GVWon 40
W#1 DoublesPamela Loyd / Racquel Holder vs Leslie Gallant / Allison Sutter6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathleen Janssen / Benay Weintraub vs Irena Feofanova / Julia Bush6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesMaria Cortes vs Anna Pfarrer6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStacey Carney / Colundra Owens vs Jennifer Cox / Kimberly Taeubel6-2, 6-3
2021-04-24vs SUMMERLIN ARBORSWon 50
W#1 DoublesKathleen Janssen / Benay Weintraub vs Elisabeth Golden / Dena Deluca6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMaria Cortes vs Aubrey Adams6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStacey Carney / Colundra Owens vs Anna Bishop / Mary Lynn Weber1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesEmily Adams vs Stacia Walker6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAshley Prandecki / Pamela Loyd vs Nicola Wien / Virginia Kirkendall3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-17vs TPCWon 31
W#1 DoublesStacey Carney / Tracy Hall vs K C Scherrer / Nicole Sorrentino6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPamela Loyd / Racquel Holder vs Ashton Aguilar / Belinda Hines6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesColundra Owens vs Bonnie Taney1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesStacey Heroy / Benay Weintraub vs Valerie Andriani / Jill Sutherin6-3, 6-0
2021-04-10vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GVWon 21
W#1 SinglesMaria Cortes vs Julia Bush6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStacey Carney / Tracy Hall vs Leslie Gallant / Allison Sutter6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesColundra Owens / Pamela Loyd vs Jennifer Cox / Belinda Smith4-6, 4-6
2021-03-27vs SUMMERLIN ARBORSWon 30
W#2 DoublesRacquel Holder / Pamela Loyd vs Elisabeth Golden / Kim Haines4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesColundra Owens vs Michelle Wu6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Janssen / Benay Weintraub vs Anna Bishop / Nicola Wien6-0, 6-3
2021-03-20vs TPCWon 30
W#1 DoublesStacey Carney / Tracy Hall vs Marisela Cruz / Jill Sutherin6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMaria Cortes vs Ashton Aguilar6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesColundra Owens / Caroline Hsu vs Jennifer Cribb / Bonnie Taney6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 WOMEN- 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.50 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.96
Maria Cortes
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 5
4.72
Benay Weintraub
published 5
4.32
Stacey Heroy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Colundra Owens
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 4.5
Emily Adams
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 4.5
Pamela Loyd
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.00
Stacey Carney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ashley Prandecki
published
Kathleen Janssen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Racquel Holder
published
Terri Weisbord
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey Heroy + Stacey Carney4258% games+2.5% vs expected
Colundra Owens + Stacey Carney8649% games−3.2% vs expected
Kathleen Janssen + Pamela Loyd3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Maria Cortes
58W–15L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
4.96
5
Benay Weintraub
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
4.72
4.5
Stacey Heroy
162W–94L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Colundra Owens
62W–52L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Emily Adams
147W–54L career · 10 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Pamela Loyd
57W–49L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stacey Carney
61W–52L career · 6 lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
4.00
Ashley Prandecki
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Janssen
47W–25L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Racquel Holder
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Terri Weisbord
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.