← Search

Colundra Owens

Las Vegas, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 62W–52L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Colundra Owens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2025-02-02 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matt Szen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-1
L
2025-01-25 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacey Carney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-01-19 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matt Szen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-01-18 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacey Carney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-01-11 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Taeubel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-01-05 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nakul Jariwala mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-01-04 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary McNulty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2024-11-23 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary McNulty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-11-16 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Morgan Daley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-10-26 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacey Carney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2024-10-19 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacey Carney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-10-05 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Morgan Daley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
56.4%
31W–24L · 54.2% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 62.3% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
54.5%
12W–10L · 54.2% of games
9.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 27% of the time
#3 Doubles
27%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#1 Singles
16%
18 matches
#2 Singles
8%
9 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal