← Search

Kati Bainbridge

Las Vegas, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
340 matches · 233W–107L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.99
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
54%
down to 4.0
46%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 33% down · 67% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.04. Higher than today’s 3.99 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.5
25 of 39
NV · 4.5
39 of 61

Kati is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kati has played at 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

3.03.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Kati has gone from the 10th to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
90%
27W–3L · 68.8% of games
3.5
72.4%
55W–21L · 59.4% of games
4.0
72.1%
101W–39L · 58.5% of games
4.5
45.7%
32W–38L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history340 matches
L
Jennifer Cerny / Daria Shalina
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peggy Wu
−0.026below expectation — took 41% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Glenda Li / Elisabeth Golden
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peggy Wu
+0.004better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Mary Lynn Weber / Nicola Wien
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Williams
+0.005about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Christa Casper / April Denise Belcher
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Williams
+0.114better than expected — took 92% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peggy Wu
−0.018below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Tontapanish
−0.051below expectation — took 25% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Nicola Wien / Desiree Kathmann
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peggy Wu
+0.021better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Belinda Smith / Aida Tracy
2026-01-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lucy Twohy
−0.021below expectation — took 38% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
Jennifer Cox / Katherine Olivier
2025-12-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Adams
−0.079below expectation — took 20% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-12-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bonnie Taney - *
+0.027better than expected — took 64% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 1-0
L
2025-12-05 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brigitte Fallon
−0.029below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Tontapanish
−0.004about as expected — took 52% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.