← Teams

3.TOC.Holloman

2022 CTRL Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.56 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-07vs 2.TOC.PopeWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesGlen Hacker / David Hofberg vs John Kata / Jamie Huang6-4, 6-0
2022-04-25vs 6.CAS.WrightWon 2–0
W#2 DoublesDonald Wood / Steve Pigora vs Tom Roeder / Scott Lundy2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTim Cavanaugh / Mark Spining vs James Wysocki / J Wright6-4, 6-3
2022-04-02vs 1.TOC.SebringSplit 1–1
W#1 DoublesTim Cavanaugh / Steve Pigora vs Jeff Huxtable / Carlos Kim6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSteve Piucci / Mark Spining vs Steve Clark / Dale Simser6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-26vs 5.KF.DanielSplit 1–1
L#1 SinglesChris Malory vs Stephane Daniel2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMark Spining / Steve Piucci vs Bert Clancey / William Pencola6-0, 6-4
2022-03-24vs 4.PW.BlondellWon 2–1
L#1 DoublesDonald Wood / Steve Pigora vs Ryan Kessler / Alan Shepherd1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Hofberg / Andy Holloman vs David McDaniel / Ariel Edery7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTim Cavanaugh / Mark Spining vs Ray Kwiatek / Lou Hensley6-0, 6-1
2022-03-19vs 2.TOC.PopeWon 3–0
W#1 DoublesAndy Holloman / Chris Malory vs Chris Hagan / Michael Wood6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDan Robinson / Mark Spining vs Eduardo Delossantos / Jonathan Inman6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDavid Hofberg / Matthew Lee vs Jamie Huang / Luis Martinez Preciado6-0, 6-2
2022-03-05Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesSteve Pigora / Steve Piucci vs Timothy Aube / Tom Roeder4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Tim Cavanaugh
published —
3.66
Mark Spining
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.33
Greg Cox
published 3.5
3.30
Dan Robinson
published 3.5
3.28
Andy Holloman
published 3.5
3.25
Steve Pigora
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Chris Malory
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Glen Hacker
published 3.5
3.01
David Hofberg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Pigora + Glen Hacker3–14 matchesnot enough data
Tim Cavanaugh + Mark Spining1–23 matchesnot enough data
Steve Pigora + Andy Holloman3–03 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—
Tim Cavanaugh
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Mark Spining
161W–93L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Greg Cox
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Dan Robinson
12W–32L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Andy Holloman
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Steve Pigora
93W–110L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Chris Malory
74W–54L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Glen Hacker
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
David Hofberg
34W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.