Teams

4.PW.Blondell

2022 CTRL Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-30vs 3.TOC.HollomanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid McDaniel / Ariel Edery vs Dan Robinson / Donald Wood6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAlan Shepherd / Lou Hensley vs Steve Piucci / Shantonu Mazumdar7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-23Won 10
W#1 SinglesAriel Edery vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-02vs 2.TOC.PopeLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlan Shepherd / Lou Hensley vs Jamie Huang / Dan Vierno5-7, 3-6
2022-03-26vs 1.TOC.SebringSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDavid McDaniel / Ariel Edery vs Ankur Shah / Dale Simser6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlan Shepherd / Lou Hensley vs Andrew Butler / Rick Alder3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-24vs 3.TOC.HollomanLost 02
L#2 DoublesDavid McDaniel / Ariel Edery vs David Hofberg / Andy Holloman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRay Kwiatek / Lou Hensley vs Tim Cavanaugh / Mark Spining0-6, 1-6
2022-03-05vs 5.KF.DanielWon 10
W#3 DoublesAriel Edery / Ray Kwiatek vs William Pencola / Roy Johnson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Ryan Kessler
published
3.68
Joshua Moore
published
3.29
Blake Hall
published 3.5
3.29
Joe Francis
published
3.28
David McDaniel
published 3.5
3.24
Jay Dexheimer
published
3.14
Ariel Edery
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.97
Lou Hensley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Vito Guarnaccia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lou Hensley + Ariel Edery033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Kessler
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
Joshua Moore
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Blake Hall
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Joe Francis
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
David McDaniel
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Jay Dexheimer
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Ariel Edery
45W–73L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Lou Hensley
122W–118L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
2.97
Vito Guarnaccia
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.