Teams

W109:Sweet Shots:Philips/Partello

2024 EMA Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-05vs LFW:Longfellow Legends:KottlerLost 12
L#1 DoublesLizzie Phillips / Wendy Kranseler vs Sandra Mario-Williams / Pia Illarramendi3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmy DiVincenzo / Gerri Partello vs Marcy Buckler / Anne Kottler3-6, 6-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSue Klein / Kelly Hiller vs Joanne Schwartz / Rosemary Comrie7-5, 4-4
2024-07-15vs LFW:Longfellow Legends:KottlerLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Caron / Nancy Magier vs Marcy Buckler / Anne Kottler2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBeverly Northam / Carol O'Neill vs Sandra Mario-Williams / Pia Illarramendi1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRose Caira / Geraldine Bergonzi vs Amy Robbins / Alison Taunton-Rigby6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesCheryl Caron / Gerri Partello vs Kimberly Murphy / Jennifer Roy5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Hiller / Elizabeth Pond vs Melanie Bedrosian / Elizabeth Bracher6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesWendy Kranseler / Mary Jean Kelley vs Marcia Tabenken / Michele Bertolami6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Pond / Sue Klein vs Jennifer Roy / Katsuko Sugiyama6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesYelena Kruss / Lizzie Phillips vs Kimberly Murphy / Michele Bertolami6-7, 5-6
W#3 DoublesGerri Partello / Jennifer Orr vs Cecelia Bolognia / Elizabeth Bracher6-3, 7-5
2024-06-24vs LFW:Longfellow Legends:KottlerLost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Nagle / Laura Reilly vs Patricia O'Hagan / Pia Illarramendi6-7, 4-5
W#2 DoublesMary Jean Kelley / Wendy Kranseler vs Rita Fordiani / Sandra Mario-Williams6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAmy DiVincenzo / Kelly Hiller vs Amy Robbins / Alison Taunton-Rigby6-7, 4-4
W#1 DoublesLizzie Phillips / Elizabeth Pond vs Katsuko Sugiyama / Mary Miller6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBeverly Northam / Carol O'Neill vs Kimberly Murphy / Melanie Bedrosian7-5, 6-6
L#3 DoublesYelena Kruss / Nancy Magier vs Michele Bertolami / Julie Morse1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-03vs LFW:Longfellow Legends:KottlerLost 12
L#1 DoublesSue Klein / Nancy Magier vs Rita Fordiani / Sandra Mario-Williams4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Jean Kelley / Wendy Kranseler vs Marcy Buckler / Anne Kottler3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGeraldine Bergonzi / Rose Caira vs Pia Illarramendi / Rosemary Comrie3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesLizzie Phillips / Jennifer Orr vs Jennifer Roy / Katsuko Sugiyama4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy DiVincenzo / Kelly Hiller vs Kimberly Murphy / Julie Morse4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDenise Nagle / Laura Reilly vs Deborah Busa Cellucci / Marcia Koury6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LFW:Longfellow Legends:Kottler08141022201
2SFT:Spark:Molda08141025213
3W109:Sweet Shots:Philips/Partello08111327215
4WAC:Aced to Perfection:Roy/Calleva08111327227
5BBC:Brown Curran/Purdue0891535236
6BRTC:Bass River:Connors/Ciccone0851941263
7WESF:Westfit:Bell/Johnson0921613177
8WOB:Smash Squad:Maguire0920717201
9NETC:The Hellions:Brodin/Donovan09141331224
10CED:Causing A Racquet:Platania/Bishop09121532241
11WESF:Westfit:Wolf/Misch010191132252
12WESB:Seniors with Attitude:Raffa/Nichols01082248320
13NETC:MatchWise:Welcom01072349310

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Elizabeth Pond
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Denise Nagle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Gerri Partello
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Yelena Kruss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Cheryl Caron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Sue Klein
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Lizzie Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Kelly Hiller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Amy DiVincenzo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Beverly Northam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Carol O'Neill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Geraldine Bergonzi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Rose Caira
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Wendy Kranseler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jennifer Orr
published
Laura Reilly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Jean Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Magier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lizzie Phillips + Nancy Magier8356% games+12.6% vs expected
Amy DiVincenzo + Cheryl Caron6061% games+7.2% vs expected
Gerri Partello + Amy DiVincenzo11456% games+2.8% vs expected
Yelena Kruss + Beverly Northam6452% games+1.7% vs expected
Carol O'Neill + Elizabeth Pond5743% games+0.5% vs expected
Sue Klein + Gerri Partello5350% games−0.3% vs expected
Sue Klein + Amy DiVincenzo11554% games−0.7% vs expected
Lizzie Phillips + Gerri Partello9359% games−0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Pond
24W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Denise Nagle
31W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Gerri Partello
89W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Yelena Kruss
28W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Cheryl Caron
32W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.19
Sue Klein
66W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Lizzie Phillips
40W–42L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Kelly Hiller
27W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Amy DiVincenzo
63W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Beverly Northam
30W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Carol O'Neill
37W–47L career · 2 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
Geraldine Bergonzi
14W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
Rose Caira
16W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Wendy Kranseler
29W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
Jennifer Orr
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Reilly
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Jean Kelley
10W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Magier
26W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.