Teams

GJTC WPOMRENKE

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - WS · WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - WS

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-03vs GJTC MHALLWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathy Elliott / Debbie Pruess vs Kelley Henke / Fran Jessup6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2021-05-20vs GJTC MHALLWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathy Elliott / Debbie Pruess vs Sylvia Wilhelm / Arliss Bridgett6-1, 6-1
2021-05-13vs GJTC MHALLLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Elliott / Debbie Pruess vs Fran Jessup / Kelley Henke6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2021-05-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesKathy Elliott / Debbie Pruess vs Sylvia Wilhelm / Susan Smith6-1, 6-3
2021-04-29vs GJTC MHALLWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathy Elliott / Debbie Pruess vs Arliss Bridgett / Fran Jessup6-2, 6-0
2020-06-10vs GJTC MHALLWon 10
W#1 DoublesDebbie Pruess / Kathy Elliott vs Denise Faber / Susan Smith6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Kathy Elliott
published
3.86
Tammy Hopkins
published
3.77
Lisa Sharp
published
DIANE GRIFFITHS
published 4
3.51
Debbie Pruess
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Karen Snider
published
Kathy Daniels
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Snider + Tammy Hopkins9456% games+5.9% vs expected
Debbie Pruess + Karen Snider0636% games−6.6% vs expected
Kathy Elliott + Debbie Pruess7073% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Sharp + Tammy Hopkins3350% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Pruess + DIANE GRIFFITHS3250% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Elliott
16W–3L career · no lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
3.97
Tammy Hopkins
41W–28L career · no lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
3.86
Lisa Sharp
46W–41L career · no lines in 2021
96%4%<1%
3.77
4
DIANE GRIFFITHS
10W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Debbie Pruess
76W–78L career · 6 lines in 2021
47%53%<1%
3.51
Karen Snider
25W–39L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathy Daniels
20W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.