Teams

GJTC MHALL

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - WS · WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - WS

9 players · average NTRP 3.60 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-03vs GJTC WPOMRENKEWon 10
W#3 DoublesVirginia McHugh / Sandra Kay Miller vs DIANE GRIFFITHS / Kathy Daniels7-5, 6-3
2021-05-27vs GJTC WPOMRENKEWon 20
W#1 DoublesVirginia McHugh / Sandra Kay Miller vs Kathy Daniels / Bethany Castellini4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDenise Faber / Kelley Henke vs Lisa Sharp / DIANE GRIFFITHS6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2021-05-20vs GJTC WPOMRENKELost 01
L#1 DoublesDenise Faber / Susan Smith vs Wende Pomrenke / Tammy Hopkins7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2021-04-29vs GJTC WPOMRENKELost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Smith / Denise Faber vs Lisa Sharp / DIANE GRIFFITHS4-6, 2-6
2020-06-10vs GJTC WPOMRENKESplit 11
L#1 DoublesDenise Faber / Susan Smith vs Debbie Pruess / Kathy Elliott0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Kay Miller / Virginia McHugh vs DIANE GRIFFITHS / Lisa Sharp6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Sandra Kay Miller
published
3.90
Kelley Henke
published
3.73
Denise Faber
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.44
Arliss Bridgett
published 3.5
3.44
Fran Jessup
published 3.5
3.41
Carol Serrano
published 3.5
3.29
Virginia McHugh
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Marilyn Hall
published
Sandy Perea
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Arliss Bridgett + Carol Serrano24660% games+4.1% vs expected
Arliss Bridgett + Marilyn Hall5448% games−6.0% vs expected
Virginia McHugh + Fran Jessup4167% gamesnot enough data
Kelley Henke + Denise Faber5066% gamesnot enough data
Arliss Bridgett + Fran Jessup224 matchesnot enough data
Fran Jessup + Carol Serrano213 matchesnot enough data
Marilyn Hall + Sandy Perea303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandra Kay Miller
61W–34L career · no lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.95
Kelley Henke
67W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Denise Faber
105W–96L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Arliss Bridgett
50W–30L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Fran Jessup
37W–24L career · no lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Carol Serrano
65W–51L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Virginia McHugh
108W–96L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.29
Marilyn Hall
55W–52L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
Sandy Perea
10W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.