Teams

LMMichael/River Run

2022 Lake USTA 55 & Over League · Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-14vs LRDavis/RRCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrenda Forouzad / Patty Devine vs Debbie Noe / Lydia Dayton1-6, 0-6
2022-04-10vs LAMichalski/LNTC 55s 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Hamel / Adriane Ware vs Amy Michalski / June Larson7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-03-24vs LJRO-Rodewald/SkybrookSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJoanne Cunningham / Brenda Forouzad vs Odette Baker / Heidi Nyquist3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCathie Loveless / Carol Hamel vs Sheila Hebert / Lisa Turley6-1, 7-6
2022-03-17vs LKKaake/JP 35Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrenda Forouzad / Joanne Cunningham vs Julie Nance / Denise Takes6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-03vs LWGO-Goodwin/3.5 Thurs 55Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCarol Hamel / Nancy Staley vs Lori Kitchens / Annette Mootilal6-1, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Carol Hamel
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Brenda Forouzad
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.03
Elizabeth Bobb
published 3.5
2.96
Joanne Cunningham
published
2.96
Adriane Ware
published 3.5
2.89
Cheri Thebeau
published 3.5
2.65
Cathie Loveless
published 3
Mary Anne Michael
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Forouzad + Carol Hamel303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Hamel
78W–48L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3
Brenda Forouzad
49W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.09
3.5
Elizabeth Bobb
0W–7L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
Joanne Cunningham
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
3.5
Adriane Ware
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
3.5
Cheri Thebeau
0W–8L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.89
3
Barbara Kucharski
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Cathie Loveless
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
2.65
Mary Anne Michael
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.