Teams

LRDavis/RRCC

2022 Lake USTA 55 & Over League · Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-14vs LMMichael/River RunWon 10
W#1 DoublesJann Debord / Julli Goodwin vs Tracy Keill / Adriane Ware6-2, 6-1
2022-04-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Bowe / Lisa Squatriglia vs Crystal Hamilton / Elba Crasto4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-03-31vs LSWakeman/The PeninsulaLost 02
L#1 DoublesTracey Marchitelli / Julli Goodwin vs Mindy Francis / Maureen Leach4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Squatriglia / Robbie Davis vs Sharon McAfee / Suzun McCrary1-6, 3-6
2022-03-24vs LAMichalski/LNTC 55s 3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesJulli Goodwin / Natalie Van Epps vs May Frost / Hilda Dietrich6-3, 7-5
2022-03-17vs LSHolley/LNTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulli Goodwin / Michelle Bowe vs Lisa Smith / Sylvia Holley6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Squatriglia / Lydia Dayton vs Lorelei Hewitt / Carol Cousins0-6, 4-6
2022-03-10vs LJRO-Rodewald/SkybrookWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Squatriglia / Robbie Davis vs Susan Bumgarner / Teri Sieving6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Jann Debord
published
3.37
Natalie Van Epps
published
3.37
Michelle Bowe
published
3.34
Lori Moon
published
3.27
Lisa Squatriglia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Claire Allen
published 3.5
Debbie Noe
published 3.5
3.23
Karen Edge
published
3.15
Julli Goodwin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Teresa Meletiou
published
Lydia Dayton
published
Tracey Marchitelli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julli Goodwin + Karen Edge3247% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jann Debord
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
Natalie Van Epps
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Michelle Bowe
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Lori Moon
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Lisa Squatriglia
30W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Claire Allen
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Debbie Noe
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Edge
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Julli Goodwin
71W–70L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Teresa Meletiou
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.93
Lydia Dayton
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracey Marchitelli
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.