Teams

LSHolley/LNTC

2022 Lake USTA 55 & Over League · Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-14vs LJRO-Rodewald/SkybrookWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnna Bonham / Sylvia Holley vs Jane Rodewald / Odette Baker3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Cousins / Lorelei Hewitt vs Christine Hardin / Teri Sieving6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanice Ingram / Janet Harmon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-07vs LKKaake/JP 35Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLorelei Hewitt / Carol Cousins vs Julie Nance / Kathleen Rissberger0-6, 4-6
2022-03-31vs LMMichael/River RunWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnna Bonham / Janice Ingram vs Dana Kampschror / Nancy Staley6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLorelei Hewitt / Carol Cousins vs Barbara Kucharski / Shannon Davis6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarole Catlett / Janet Harmon vs Mary Anne Michael / Tracy Keill6-0, 6-2
2022-03-24vs LWGO-Goodwin/3.5 Thurs 55Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnna Bonham / Janice Ingram vs Cindy Japec / Crystal Hamilton3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-03-17vs LRDavis/RRCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesLorelei Hewitt / Carol Cousins vs Lisa Squatriglia / Lydia Dayton6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJanet Harmon / Jana Watt vs Claire Allen / Jann Debord6-3, 6-4
2022-03-10vs LAMichalski/LNTC 55s 3.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesLori Klenck / Anna Bonham vs Amy Michalski / Debbie Scott7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJana Watt / Janice Ingram vs Alice White / Connie Maggio6-2, 6-3
2022-03-03vs LSWakeman/The PeninsulaWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnna Bonham / Carol Cousins vs Gayle Larson / Sheila Wakeman6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Anna Bonham
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Janice Ingram
published
Carole Catlett
published 3.5
Jana Watt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Carol Cousins
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Janet Harmon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Sylvia Holley
published
2.96
Lorelei Hewitt
published
2.94
Liz Littlefield
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Cousins + Janet Harmon314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anna Bonham
150W–191L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
3.43
Janice Ingram
9W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Carole Catlett
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jana Watt
35W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Carol Cousins
51W–51L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Janet Harmon
55W–90L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Sylvia Holley
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
Lorelei Hewitt
0W–11L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
Liz Littlefield
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.