Teams

HRCA-S BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-12vs PRC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesColleen Krebsbach / Julie Johns vs Henriette Nash / Judy Jackson6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Parrish / Nancy Montini vs Lisa Rosen / Linda Manassee Buell6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNicola Zalkind / Adele Rhinehart vs Denise Debartolomeis / Debra St John6-4, 6-2
2024-06-05vs SS-H GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelinda Shaffer / Colleen Krebsbach vs Debra Benge / Ann Baer6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAlison Cejka / Dana Anderson vs Cheryl Sanders / Carol Lugo1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Parrish / Nancy Montini vs Tracy Pursell / Tricia Wright1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-05-29vs SS-LT REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesColleen Krebsbach / Melinda Shaffer vs Carrie Bryan / Carol Decker3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Parrish / Nancy Montini vs Melinda Conover / Bernadette Rottschafer3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNicola Zalkind / Alison Cejka vs Joby Koren / Diana Zoeller2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-22vs PCRK ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesMelinda Shaffer / Adele Rhinehart vs Lisa Bull / Susan Miles6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesNicola Zalkind / Julie Johns vs Heidi Pennink / Marcia Nash2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Parrish / Alison Cejka vs Kimberly Bevill / Lori McDevitt0-6, 2-6
2024-05-15vs VCC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Montini / Colleen Krebsbach vs Elizabeth Quinn / Elizabeth Watson4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDana Anderson / Nicola Zalkind vs Ashley Franklin / Emily Yeingst6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Johns / Kathleen Parisi vs Kathy Dosen / Diane Kelly1-6, 2-6
2024-05-08vs PRC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Montini / Alison Cejka vs Cynthia Kruger / Diane Wells6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDana Anderson / Kathleen Parisi vs Denise Debartolomeis / Debra St John5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMelinda Shaffer / Colleen Krebsbach vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-01vs SS-H GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesDana Anderson / Adele Rhinehart vs Christine Paulsson / Ann Baer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarol Parrish / Melinda Shaffer vs Patti Coker / Tracy Pursell1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Johns / Kathleen Parisi vs Carol Nappholz / MaryBeth Doerr6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Nancy Montini
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Melinda Shaffer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Adele Rhinehart
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Alison Cejka
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Dana Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Colleen Krebsbach
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.03
Nicola Zalkind
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.90
Julie Johns
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.82
Carol Parrish
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Kathleen Parisi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicola Zalkind + Adele Rhinehart7261% games+9.7% vs expected
Nancy Montini + Nicola Zalkind6355% games+6.3% vs expected
Adele Rhinehart + Julie Johns2448% games+5.1% vs expected
Alison Cejka + Colleen Krebsbach3648% games+3.9% vs expected
Adele Rhinehart + Melinda Shaffer151450% games+3.6% vs expected
Dana Anderson + Kathleen Parisi2743% games+2.3% vs expected
Nancy Montini + Carol Parrish252349% games+1.9% vs expected
Carol Parrish + Melinda Shaffer3547% games−0.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nancy Montini
119W–86L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Melinda Shaffer
46W–71L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Adele Rhinehart
96W–104L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Alison Cejka
70W–99L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Dana Anderson
40W–85L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Colleen Krebsbach
63W–75L career · 5 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Nicola Zalkind
69W–109L career · 4 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Julie Johns
29W–69L career · 4 lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Carol Parrish
50W–96L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
2.82
Kathleen Parisi
7W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.