Teams

PRC BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.31 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-12vs HRCA-S BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesHenriette Nash / Judy Jackson vs Colleen Krebsbach / Julie Johns1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLisa Rosen / Linda Manassee Buell vs Carol Parrish / Nancy Montini3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Debartolomeis / Debra St John vs Nicola Zalkind / Adele Rhinehart4-6, 2-6
2024-06-05vs SS-LT REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesCynthia Kruger / Henriette Nash vs Carol Decker / Bernadette Rottschafer3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDenise Debartolomeis / Diane Wells vs Sherri Hartman / Joby Koren5-7, 4-6
2024-05-29vs PCRK ORANGELost 01
L#3 DoublesDebra St John / Birgitte Sandgaard vs Heidi Pennink / Susan Miles6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-05-22vs VCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarrie del Toro / Judy Jackson vs Diane Kelly / Seanna Mulligan6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Manassee Buell / Cynthia Kruger vs Pam Hascall / Emily Yeingst3-6, 5-7
2024-05-15vs SS-H GREENWon 20
W#2 DoublesDenise Debartolomeis / Debra St John vs Cheryl Sanders / Christine Paulsson6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarrie del Toro / Birgitte Sandgaard vs MaryBeth Doerr / Carol Nappholz7-6, 6-4
2024-05-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesDenise Debartolomeis / Debra St John vs Dana Anderson / Kathleen Parisi7-5, 6-4
2024-05-01vs SS-LT REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarrie del Toro / Henriette Nash vs Kristen Arsenault / Melinda Conover1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBirgitte Sandgaard / Denise Debartolomeis vs Bernadette Rottschafer / Carol Decker4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Diane Wells
published 3.5
3.19
Cynthia Kruger
published 3.5
3.17
Judy Jackson
published
3.16
Birgitte Sandgaard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Denise Debartolomeis
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
Debra St John
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Henriette Nash
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Carrie del Toro
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Linda Manassee Buell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Henriette Nash + Birgitte Sandgaard4158% games+13.3% vs expected
Denise Debartolomeis + Debra St John263347% games−1.8% vs expected
Henriette Nash + Linda Manassee Buell61743% games−2.8% vs expected
Henriette Nash + Carrie del Toro31939% games−6.0% vs expected
Linda Manassee Buell + Carrie del Toro3343% gamesnot enough data
Denise Debartolomeis + Carrie del Toro0542% gamesnot enough data
Denise Debartolomeis + Cynthia Kruger134 matchesnot enough data
Debra St John + Linda Manassee Buell044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Wells
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cynthia Kruger
12W–19L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Judy Jackson
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Birgitte Sandgaard
49W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Denise Debartolomeis
83W–107L career · 5 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Debra St John
77W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Henriette Nash
68W–128L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Carrie del Toro
65W–124L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%56%43%
2.98
3
Linda Manassee Buell
78W–122L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.