Teams

Wyoming/Ellbogan/ITAMixed7.5

2026 ITA - WY Mixed · 7.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.58 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-19vs Hit and RunLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Litke / Stacia Vigneri vs Daniel Plowman / Emily McRady4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTom Ellbogen / TimAnn Day vs Josh Cossitt / Katherine Plowman4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Yost / Kim Byrd vs Charles Oneill / Kristy Hammond6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-18vs Hit and RunWon 21
W#1 DoublesJacob Pierce / Mary Ridgeway vs Charles Oneill / Emily McRady6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Litke / Kim Byrd vs Josh Cossitt / Katherine Plowman5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTom Ellbogen / Stacia Vigneri vs Brandon DeJongh / Kristy Hammond5-4
2026-07-18vs Hit and RunWon 21
W#1 DoublesJacob Pierce / TimAnn Day vs Katherine Plowman / Daniel Plowman6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Litke / Mary Ridgeway vs Josh Cossitt / Emily McRady6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Yost / Stacia Vigneri vs Charles Oneill / Kristy Hammond6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jacob Pierce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Stacia Vigneri
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
TimAnn Day
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Mary Ridgeway
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Barbara Rea
published 3.5
Tom Ellbogen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
John Yost
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Litke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacia Vigneri + Tom Ellbogen314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jacob Pierce
5W–4L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Stacia Vigneri
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
TimAnn Day
6W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Mary Ridgeway
26W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Barbara Rea
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Tom Ellbogen
3W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
John Yost
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kim Byrd
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Litke
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.